DOE P 450.4A Chg 1 (MinChg), Integrated Safety Management Policy
Functional areas: Integrated Safety Management, Safety
To establish the Department of Energy's (DOE) expectation for safety, including integrated safety management that will enable the Department’s mission goals to be accomplished efficiently while ensuring safe operations at all departmental facilities and activities. Supersedes DOE P 450.4A.
Version history and related documents
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
- DOE P 450.4AIntegrated Safety Management Policy (Jan 18, 2018)
Related documents
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY:
www.directives.doe.gov Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy
U.S. Department of Energy POLICY
Washington, D.C.
Approved: 4-25-2011
Chg 1 (MinChg): 1-18-2018
SUBJECT: INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
To establish the Department of Energy's (DOE) expectation for safety,1 including integrated
safety management that will enable the Department’s mission goals to be accomplished
efficiently while ensuring safe operations at all departmental facilities and activities. This Policy
cancels and supersedes DOE Policy (P) 411.1, Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities,
and Authorities Policy, dated 1-28-97; DOE P 441.1, DOE Radiological Health and Safety
Policy, dated 4-26-96; DOE P 450.2A, Identifying, Implementing and Complying with
Environment, Safety and Health Requirements, dated 5-15-96; DOE P 450.4, Safety Management
System Policy, dated 10-15-96; and DOE P 450.7, Environment, Safety and Health (ESH) Goals,
dated 8-2-04.
POLICY
It is the Department’s policy that work be conducted safely and efficiently and in a manner that
ensures protection of workers, the public, and the environment. To achieve this Policy, effective
safety requirements and goals are established; applicable national and international consensus
standards are adopted; and where necessary to address unique conditions, additional standards
are developed and effectively implemented. Implementing Integrated Safety Management (ISM)
requirements for Federal organizations are established through directives, and for contractor
organizations through contract clauses.
The Department’s ultimate safety goal is zero accidents, work-related injuries and illnesses,
regulatory violations, and reportable environmental releases. The Department expects that for all
activities and phases in the lifecycle of missions (design, construction, research and
development, operations, and decommissioning and decontamination), appropriate mechanisms
are in place to ensure that exposures to workers, the public, and the environment to radiological
and nonradiological hazards are maintained below regulatory limits. Furthermore, DOE expects
that deliberate efforts are taken to keep exposures to radiation as low as reasonably achievable.
The Department will implement integrated safety management systems to systematically
integrate safety into management and work practices at all levels in the planning and execution
of work. All organizations will develop, maintain, and implement ISM systems for their
operations and work practices, based upon the ISM Guiding Principles and Core Functions, as
outlined below. To improve effectiveness and efficiency, organizations are expected to tailor
their safety management system to the hazards and risks associated with the work activities
supporting the mission; including using established mechanisms to tailor requirements. Further,
decisions impacting safety are made by technically qualified managers with knowledge of the
1 “Safety” in this policy refers to environment, safety, and health to encompass protection of the workers, the public, and the
environment.
DOE P 450.4A
http://www.directives.doe.gov/
2 DOE P 450.4A
4-25-2011
Section 2
operations and after consideration of hazards, risks, and performance history. To complement
these systems and mechanisms, the Department expects all organizations to embrace a strong
safety culture where safe performance of work and involvement of workers in all aspects of work
performance are core values that are deeply, strongly, and consistently held by managers and
workers. Organizations foster that culture by leadership commitment and behaviors consistent
with those values; establishing a safety conscious work environment in which employees feel
free to raise safety concerns to management without fear of retaliation; prioritizing concerns
based on safety significance; addressing and resolving those concerns in a manner that provides
transparency; and supporting a questioning attitude concerning safety by all employees.
The ultimate responsibility and accountability for ensuring adequate protection of the workers,
the public, and the environment from the operation of DOE facilities rests with DOE line
management. The Department will meet this responsibility by:
• Establishing functions and clear lines of responsibilities, authorities, and appropriate
accountabilities;
• Measuring safety management performance, with special emphasis on work related to high
consequence activities2 by evaluating incident reports; using environment, safety, and health
performance measures; and assessing performance; and
• Holding itself and its contractors accountable at all organizational levels for safety
performance through codified safety regulations, contract clauses, DOE directives, and the
use of contractual and regulatory enforcement tools.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT
• LINE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY. Line management is directly
responsible for the protection of the workers, the public, and the environment.
• CLEAR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. Clear and unambiguous lines of authority and
responsibility for ensuring safety are established and maintained at all organizational levels
within the Department and its contractors.
• COMPETENCE COMMENSURATE WITH RESPONSIBILITIES. Personnel possess the
experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that are necessary to discharge their
responsibilities.
• BALANCED PRIORITIES. Resources are effectively allocated to address safety,
programmatic, and operational considerations. Protecting the workers, the public, and the
environment is a priority whenever activities are planned and performed.
• IDENTIFICATION OF SAFETY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. Before work is
performed, the associated hazards are evaluated and an agreed-upon set of safety standards
2 These activities include, but are not limited to, Hazard Category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities and activities to protect strategic
quantities of special nuclear material and highly sensitive information assets.
DOE P 450.4A 3 (and 4)
4-25-2011
and requirements is established which, if properly implemented, will provide adequate
assurance that the workers, the public, and the environment are protected from adverse
consequences.
• HAZARD CONTROLS TAILORED TO WORK BEING PERFORMED. Administrative
and engineering controls to prevent and mitigate hazards are tailored to the work being
performed and associated hazards.
• OPERATIONS AUTHORIZATION. The conditions and requirements to be satisfied for
operations to be initiated and conducted are clearly established and agreed upon.
CORE FUNCTIONS FOR INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT
Section 3
These five core safety management functions provide the necessary structure for any work
activity that could potentially affect the workers, the public, and the environment. The functions
are applied as a continuous cycle with the degree of rigor appropriate to address the type of work
activity and the hazards involved.
• DEFINE THE SCOPE OF WORK. Missions are translated into work, expectations are set,
tasks are identified and prioritized, and resources are allocated.
• ANALYZE THE HAZARDS. Hazards associated with the work are identified, analyzed,
and categorized.
• DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT HAZARD CONTROLS. Applicable standards and
requirements are identified and agreed-upon, controls to prevent/mitigate hazards are
identified, the safety envelope is established, and controls are implemented.
• PERFORM WORK WITHIN CONTROLS. Readiness is confirmed and work is performed
safely.
• PROVIDE FEEDBACK AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT. Feedback information on
the adequacy of controls is gathered; opportunities for improving the definition and planning
of work are identified and implemented.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
DAN BROUILLETTE
Deputy Secretary
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
POLICY
GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS FOR INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT