DOE O 5000.1B, Institutional Planning by Multiprogram Laboratories
Functional areas: Program Planning and Management
Cancels DOE 5000.1A. Canceled by DOE N 251.7.
Superseded By:
DOE N 251.7, Cancellation of Directives on Sep 30, 1995
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE N 251.7Cancellation of Directives (Sep 30, 1995)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
THIS PAGE MUST BE KEPT WITH DOE 5000.1B. INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING
BY MULTIPROGRAM LABORATORIES.
DOE 5000.1B, INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING BY MULTIPROGRAM
LABORATORIES HAS REVISED DOE 5000.1A TO REFLECT
ORGANIZATIONAL TITLE AND ROUTING SYMBOL EDITORIAL
CHANGES REQUIRED BY 5EN-6D-91. IN ADDITION, DOE
5000.4A, LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
HAS BEEN ADDED AS A REFERENCE, AND INFORMATION WHICH
PREVIOUSLY APPEARED IN DOE 5000.1A AND NOW APPEARS
IN DOE 5000.4A HAS BEEN DELETED FROM DOE 5000.1B.
NO SUBSTANTIVE POLICY CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE. DUE
TO THE NUMBER OF PAGES AFFECTED BY THE REVISIONS. THE
ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A REVISION.
U.S. Department of Energy ORDER
Washington, D.C.
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
SUBJECT: INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING BY MULTIPROGRAM LABORATORIES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PURPOSE. To establish the Department’s policies regarding institutional
planning by its multi program laboratories. The general characteristics
of a satisfactory planning process are outlined, the Departmental
responsibilities are defined, and the relationship of the planning
process to the oversight of laboratory exploratory R&D and work for
others is described.
CANCELLATION. DOE 5000.1A, INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING PROCESS, of 9-12-86.
SCOPE. The previsions of this Order apply to all Departmental Elements
which direct, monitor, or utilize the Department’s multiprogram
laboratories and to contractors performing work for the Department, as
provided by law and/or contract, and as implemented by the appropriate
contracting officer.
BACKGROUND. The Institutional Planning Process applies to the major
multiprogram laboratories of the Department listed in Attachment 1.
These laboratories are Government-owned and operated for the Government
by university or industrial contractors who are responsible for manage-
ment of the laboratories. Each laboratory conducts work for several
major DOE programs but is assigned to an individual DOE Program
Secretarial Officer for overall management oversight. The contracts for
the laboratories are administered by DOE Field Offices. This method of
operating the laboratories allows the Department to obtain and employ
the most effective management from the private sector.
REFERENCES.
a. DOE 4300.2B, NON-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNDED WORK, of 7-16-91,
establishes the policy and procedures for authorizing and
administering non-DOE funded work at all the DOE research or
production facilities operated by management and operating
contractors.
b. DOE 4320.1B, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, of 1-7-91, which establishes
the policies and assigns responsibilities and authorities for the
planning and development of Department of Energy sites.
c. DOE 5000.2B, MULTIPROGRAM LABORATORY APPRAISALS, of 4-9-92, which
establishes the policy and objectives for appraising the performance
of the Department’s multiprogram laboratories.
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Energy Research
2 DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
d. DOE 5000.4A, LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, of
4-9-92, which establishes the Department’s policy and guidelines
regarding Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at its
multiprogram laboratories.
e. DOE 5600.1, MANAGEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WEAPON PROGRAM
AND WEAPON COMPLEX, of 6-27-79, which establishes the policy and
procedures for the management of the DOE weapon program and weapon
complex and for the utilization of weapon complex facilities for
nonweapon activities.
Section 2
f. DOE 5700.7B, WORK AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM, of 9-24-86, which
establishes a uniform process for assigning and controlling work
performed by the designated management and operating (M&O)
contractors.
6. DEFINITIONS.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Cognizant Secretarial Officer is a Program Secretarial Officer of
the Department, who has responsibility for management oversight of a
multiprogram laboratory.
Institutional Plan is the document which reports the results of the
laboratory’s annual integrated planning, for the entire facility and
organization as a whole, to the Cognizant Secretarial Officer. The
plan reports both the baseline 5-year planning and the 15-year
strategic planning of the laboratory.
Institutional Planning Process is the detailed sequence of
activities that implement the annual institutional planning cycle of
the Department. The process is established by the Director of
Energy Research and coordinated with field and Headquarters elements
through the Institutional Planning Working Group.
Institutional Planning Working Group is a Committee which annually
reviews the experience of institutional planning in the multiprogram
laboratories and recommends improvements to the process and its
documentation. The working group is made up of senior institutional
planners from the cognizant Program Secretarial Offices, plus
representatives from the multiprogram laboratories and related DOE
Field Offices. It is chaired by the Director of Laboratory
Management (ER-42).
Laboratory Strategic Plan is the laboratory’s statement of its
future development over a 20-year period, based on stated
assumptions in the Institutional Plan of the laboratory.
Multiprogram Laboratory is a major Departmental laboratory which
conducts significant tasks for several programs, no one of which
dominates the laboratory’s institutional nature.
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
3
7.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
New Work is a new task assignment significantly beyond the scope or
level of work agreed upon in the laboratory’s approved Institutional
Plan.
On-site Review is an annual meeting of the multiprogram laboratory
director, the responsible DOE Field Office Manager, appropriate
Program Secretarial Officers, and the Cognizant Secretarial Officer
for the laboratory. The purpose of the meeting is to review the
laboratory’s draft institutional plan (including issues,
initiatives, and 20-year strategic plan) and the laboratory’s
response to summary appraisals.
Program Secretarial Officer is a senior outlay program official and
includes the Assistant Secretaries for Conservation and Renewable
Energy (CE), Defense Programs (DP), Environmental Restoration and
Waste Management (EM) Nuclear Energy (NE), and Fossil Energy, and
the Directors of Energy Research (ER), New Production Reactors (NP),
and Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (RW).
Responsible DOE Field Office Manager is the manager of the DOE Field
Office which provides the contract management function for a
laboratory’s management contract.
Site Development Plan is a formal written document summarizing all
of the various data necessary to plan for the most effective
utilization, orderly future development, and disposal of land and
facilities at an individual site.
Summary Appraisal is an annual report including findings and
recommendations resulting from an evaluation of laboratory
management activities conducted, in accordance with DOE 5000.2.
Section 3
POLICY. The oversight and control of each multiprogram laboratory’s
management will be assigned to a Cognizant Secretarial Officer of the
Department. In exercising this oversight, the Cognizant Secretarial
Officers will ensure that each of their laboratories establishes and
uses a process for-medium and long-range planning of its future as an
integral institution. Specific related policy includes:
a.
b.
Each multiprogram laboratory identified in Attachment 1 will carry
out institutional planning annually and report the results to its
Cognizant Secretarial Officer in its Institutional Plan.
Work assigned to a laboratory will be in general agreement with the
missions and program projections documented in its Institutional
Plan.
4 DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
c. Work assignments to M&O contractors will not be approved if they
represent attempts on the part of Headquarters Elements to obtain
support services that are not a part of the approved missions of the
M&O contractor.
8. RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES.
a. The Secretary.
(1) Is the sole authority establishing the role of the multi program
laboratories and the policies governing their use. This
authority may be delegated by the Secretary in whole or in
part.
(2) Issues the Department’s policy guidance to the multiprogram
laboratories.
(3) Annually reviews the results of multiprogram laboratory
institutional planning.
(4) Meets with Program or Cognizant Secretarial Officers and DOE
Field Office Managers, as necessary, to address laboratory
issues.
b. Director of Energy Research.
(1) Provides recommendations to the Secretary on Departmental
policy relating to the multiprogram laboratories.
(2) Develops the Institutional Planning Process and issues
general Departmental instructions for multiprogram laboratory
institutional planning.
(3) Utilizes input from an Institutional Planning Working Group to
develop the planning process and coordinate its implementation.
c. Cognizant Secretarial Officers.
(1) Ensure that laboratories under their cognizance conduct 5-year
baseline planning and strategic 20-year long-range planning
outlining the laboratory’s future development.
(2) Utilize the Institutional Planning Process and the Departmental
instructions provided by the Director of Energy Research in the
institutional oversight of their laboratories.
(3) Provide the annual call, schedule, and guidance for
institutional planning to their laboratories.
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
5
(4) Overview the Institutional Planning Process, conduct on-site
reviews, establish agreement with Program Secretarial Officers,
DOE Field Office Managers, and laboratory directors on the
general nature and level of program activities to be conducted
in each of their laboratories.
(5) Approve the annual Institutional Plan of each of their
laboratories.
(6) Ensure that each approved Institutional Plan contains a focused
set of laboratory missions that define the present and future
major technical activities the Department wishes the laboratory
to pursue.
(7) Identify ‘laboratory issues that require Secretarial
consideration and participate in deriving an appropriate
solution for each issue.
(8) Identify laboratory issues, initiatives, and problems, during
internal budget reviews, that require consideration as part of
the budget decisionmaking process.
(9) During the annual on-site review, laboratory actions to correct
deficiencies identified by the summary appraisal of the
laboratory.
Section 4
(10) Approve major new work assignments proposed for their
laboratories.
d. Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs modifies the laboratory
planning system specified in DOE 5600.1 so that it complies, as much
as possible, with all basic requirements of the Institutional
Planning Process and its procedures, guidance, and format
specifications, as established by the Director of Energy Research.
e. Program Secretarial Officers.
(1) Utilize the Institutional Planning Process and cooperate fully
with the Cognizant Secretarial Officers in implementing the
process.
(2) Provide strategic program guidance to the multi program
laboratories.
(3) Review and provide comments on draft institutional plans from
laboratories conducting activities in their program areas.
(4) Provide the Cognizant Secretarial Officers with current program
planning and expected future use of individual laboratories.
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
(5) Participate in the on-site reviews of laboratories with a
significant level of activities in their program areas.
(6) Notify the Cognizant Secretarial Officer of any significant
barriers to approval of the Institutional Plans. Provide
comments necessary to guide the next annual planning cycle of
the laboratory.
f. Chief Financial Officer.
(1) Prepares an annual table of anticipated laboratory funding,
based on data from Program Secretarial Officers.
(2) In exercising responsibility for site planning, established by
DOE 4320.1B, reviews each Institutional Plan to assure that it
is congruous with the Site Development Plan of the laboratory.
g. Managers of Responsible DOE Field Offices.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Act as agents of the Cognizant Secretarial Officers in the
implementation of institutional planning.
Ensure that the directors of the multiprogram laboratories
under their purview comply with the institutional planning
requirements established by the Cognizant Secretarial Officer
and the Department-wide process.
Provide Cognizant Secretarial Officers an independent review of
issues, new initiatives, proposed construction, missions, and
laboratory general purpose resource requirements, prior to the
laboratory’s on-site review.
Provide the Cognizant Secretarial Officer with independent
assessment of a laboratory’s actions taken as a result of
deficiencies identified by a summary appraisal of the
laboratory.
Monitor new work assignments, from the Department or other
sources, to ensure that they are appropriate to the laboratory
contract scope of work and the approved missions and are not in
direct competition with the private sector.
Monitor and approve non-DOE funded work to assure consistency
with Departmental policy and guidelines.
9. A TYPICAL INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING CYCLE. The following outline describes
the major steps which are considered important elements of a normal
institutional planning cycle. Details of the cycle, or arrangement of
the steps in time, can be modified as appropriate to meet unusual annual
or laboratory situations:
6
DOE 5000.1B 7
4-9-92
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
The Secretary issues the multiprogram
the Department.
laboratory policy guidance for
The Director of Energy Research coordinates and issues the
Department’s general instructions for multiprogram laboratory
institutional planning.
Cognizant Secretarial Officers issue a call for institutional
planning to their multiprogram laboratories and schedule their
on-site reviews.
Section 5
Management of each multiprogram laboratory submits a draft
institutional plan to the Cognizant Secretarial Officer and the
responsible DOE Field Office.
The responsible DOE Field Office reviews the draft institutional
plan of each laboratory within its purview, provides comments, and
notifies the Cognizant Secretarial Officer as to whether the
projected work is within the scope and provisions of the contract
and is appropriate to the mission of the laboratory.
Program Secretarial Officers review each draft institutional plan
submittal, including the strategic plan and planning assumptions, in
which the activities of their programs are discussed and submit
comments to the Cognizant Secretarial Officer.
The Cognizant Secretarial Officers conduct institutional planning
onsite reviews at their multiprogram laboratories.
The Cognizant Secretarial Officers provide the comments from the
program reviews and guidance for preparing the annual Institutional
Plan to their laboratories.
Each multiprogram laboratory prepares an annual Institutional Plan.
The responsible DOE Field Office reviews the plan, in draft, to
ensure that it complies with and incorporates the essential program
comments and the Cognizant Secretarial Officer’s guidance.
Each multiprogram laboratory publishes its Institutional Plan and
distributes it according to instructions from Headquarters.
The DOE Field Office reviews the final plan and notifies the
Cognizant Secretarial Officer of its general acceptability as a
baseline for future work assignments and for distribution.
Program Secretarial Officers review each Institutional Plan and
notify the Cognizant Secretarial Officer if, for any reason, it is
not acceptable as a general agreement on assignment of program work.
DOE 5000.1B
4-9-92
m. The Cognizant Secretarial Officers approve the plans of their
multiprogram laboratories.
n. The Secretary reviews the results of the laboratories’ annual
institutional planning.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
JOHN J. NETTLES, JR.
Director of Administration
and Human Resource Management