DOE G 414.1-1B, Management and Independent Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4 -1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of DOE Oversight Policy
Functional areas: Defense Nuclear Facility Safety and Health Requirement, Safety
This Guide provides information on establishing processes for performing effective assessments. The revision to Guide reflects updated assessment practices, international standards, and changes in DOE expectations.
Cancels DOE G 414.1-1A. Certified 11-18-10. Canceled by DOE G 414.1-1C.
Supersedes:
Superseded By:
DOE G 414.1-1C, Management and Independent Assessments Guide on Mar 27, 2014
Certified By:
DOE G 414.1-1B (Cert Memo), Certification for DOE G 414.1-1B on Nov 18, 2010
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE G 414.1-1CManagement and Independent Assessments Guide (Mar 27, 2014)
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Health, Safety and Security
DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Certified: 11-18-10
MANAGEMENT AND
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENTS GUIDE
FOR USE WITH
10 CFR, Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality
Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management
System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of
Department of Energy Oversight Policy
[Guides can serve as reference sources for acceptable, non-mandatory implementation
methods to satisfy requirements of Orders, Notices, and Manuals. NOTE: Guides do
not establish requirements or constitute the basis for a finding of non-compliance with a
specific requirement]
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, D.C. 20585
NOT MEASUREMENT
SENSITIVE
DOE G 414.1-1B i
9-27-07
CONTENTS
FOREWORD................................................................................................................................ iii
BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... v
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1
2. APPLICATION........................................................................................................................ 3
3. GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................. 5
3.1 Assessment Program Expectations........................................................................... 5
3.2 Assessment Benefits ................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Graded Approach ...................................................................................................... 6
3.4 Purpose of Assessment............................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Assessment Elements .................................................................................. 7
3.5 Types of Assessment .................................................................................................. 8
3.5.1 Management Assessment............................................................................ 8
3.5.2 Independent Assessment ............................................................................ 9
3.6 Organizational Activity Levels ............................................................................... 10
3.6.1 Process Level Assessments ....................................................................... 10
3.6.2 System Level Assessments........................................................................ 11
3.6.3 Program Level Assessments..................................................................... 11
3.7 Assessing for Compliance and Performance ......................................................... 12
3.7.1 Compliance Assessment............................................................................ 12
3.7.2 Performance-Based Assessment .............................................................. 12
4. GUIDELINES ........................................................................................................................ 15
4.1 Assessment Personnel .............................................................................................. 15
4.2 Assessment Program Planning ............................................................................... 16
Section 2
4.2.1 Assessment Programs ............................................................................... 16
4.2.2 Management Assessment Planning ......................................................... 17
4.2.3 Independent Assessment Planning .......................................................... 18
4.2.4 Planning Updates ...................................................................................... 18
4.3 Assessment Integration............................................................................................ 18
4.4 Assessment Plan ....................................................................................................... 19
4.5 Performance Criteria............................................................................................... 20
4.6 Assessment Planning Tools ..................................................................................... 21
4.7 Independent Assessment Process............................................................................ 22
4.7.1 Pre-assessment Meetings .......................................................................... 22
4.7.2 The Entrance Meeting .............................................................................. 22
4.7.3 Performing Independent Assessments .................................................... 23
4.7.4 Independent Assessment Techniques...................................................... 24
4.7.5 The Exit Meeting....................................................................................... 25
4.7.6 Assessment Reporting............................................................................... 25
4.7.7 Releasing and Responding to Assessment Reports ................................ 26
4.7.8 Corrective Actions .................................................................................... 26
4.7.9 Follow-up Assessments ............................................................................. 27
ii DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
4.8 Management Assessment Process........................................................................... 27
4.8.1 Defining the System .................................................................................. 28
4.8.2 Assessment Scheduling ............................................................................. 28
4.8.3 Performing Management Assessments ................................................... 29
4.8.4 Assessment Reporting............................................................................... 29
APPENDIX A—CONSENSUS STANDARDS AND REFERENCES................................. A-1
APPENDIX B—ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONAL AREAS ................................................... B-1
APPENDIX C—TOOLS FOR ASSESSMENT PLANNING AND CONDUCT ................ C-1
APPENDIX D—MANAGEMENT AND INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PLANNING D-1
APPENDIX E—ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................... E-1
DOE G 414.1-1B iii (and iv)
9-27-07
FOREWORD
This Guide is approved for use by all Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA) components and contractors. Throughout this Guide the use of
this DOE term includes DOE and NNSA.
Suggestions for improving this Guide are welcome and should be sent to:
James O’ Brien
HS-21/270CC
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington D.C. 20585-270
Phone: (301) 903-1408
e:mail: james.o’brien@hq.doe.gov
Section 3
Guides provide preferred, non-mandatory, supplemental information about acceptable methods
for implementing requirements, including lessons learned, suggested practices, instructions, and
suggested performance measures. Guides do not impose requirements but may quote
requirements if the sources are adequately cited. Alternate methods may be used if it can be
demonstrated that they provide an equivalent or better level of performance.
DOE G 414.1-1B v (and vi)
9-27-07
BACKGROUND
Since 2001, assessment practices and DOE requirements have evolved. This revision reflects the
following assessment practices, international standards, and changes in DOE expectations related
to quality Assurance (QA):
• new requirements in DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-17-05, for corrective
action plans in response to independent oversight assessments;
• commitments in the DOE implementation plan for Defense Nuclear Safety Board
Recommendation 2004-1;
• DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy, dated
7-31-07;
• DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality
Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, dated 6-17-05;
• DOE G 414.1-5, Corrective Action Program Guide, dated 3-2-06;
• DOE O 450.1 Chg 3, Environmental Protection Program, dated 1-15-03;
• QC-1 Rev. 10, Nuclear Weapons Quality Policy;
• ASME NQA-1-2004 with 2005 Addenda; Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear
Facilities, and
• new and revised international management system standards [e.g., International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 and ISO 14001] and the integrated
environmental and quality audit standard (ISO 19011).
DOE G 414.1-1B 1 (and 2)
9-27-07
1. INTRODUCTION
DOE and its contractors are required to perform management and independent assessments in
accordance with:
• Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 830, Subpart A, “Quality Assurance
Requirements”;
• DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance;
• DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual;
• DEAR 970.5223-1, Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health into Work Planning
and Execution;
• DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy; and
• QC-1 Rev. 10, Nuclear Weapons Quality Policy.
This Guide provides information on establishing processes for performing effective assessments.
See Appendix A for a list of consensus standards and other references related to assessments.
Assessments add value to products and services by providing feedback and linking the
management and conduct of work to meaningful improvement actions. Assessment programs
should embody the following principles:
• Managers are involved in the assessment process to ensure results contribute to improved
performance of the programs, systems, and work processes.
• Managers receive timely, objective feedback from assessments.
• Managers take timely, appropriate actions to resolve quality problems.
• Feedback addresses the effectiveness of policies, requirements, standards, processes,
procedures, and their implementation.
• The process is planned, coordinated, and integrated to promote efficiency and
effectiveness.
• Organizational culture seeks quality improvement, and assessments are accepted as
contributors.
• Assessment processes and results support the goal of protecting people and the
environment.
• Quality problems (including environment, safety, and health issues) are identified for
resolution.
Section 4
DOE G 414.1-1B 3 (and 4)
9-27-07
2. APPLICATION
All DOE products and services, and the programs, systems, and processes that deliver them can
be assessed over their entire life cycles. DOE directives require integration of environment,
safety and health (ES&H), safeguards and security, and emergency management assessments to
ensure that DOE and its contractors perform assessments as stated in 10 CFR 830, Subpart A;
DOE O 414.1C; DOE M 450.4-1; and DOE O 226.1A. Examples of functional areas for
assessments are listed in Appendix B.
This Guide expands upon the details of the assessment criteria discussed in DOE G 414.1-2A,
Quality Assurance Management System Guide, dated 6-15-05. The Quality Assurance
Management System Guide also describes the relationship between quality assurance (QA) and
integrating the safety management system requirements. DOE G 450.4-1B Integrated Safety
Management System Guide (Vol. 2, Appendices D and G), dated March 1, 2001, describes the
role of assessment in the feedback and improvement of safety management functions.
DOE line managers fulfill their safety responsibilities in part through line management ES&H
oversight and have unfettered access to information and facilities in accordance with safety and
security requirements. Contractor line managers fulfill safety responsibilities in part through the
implementation of their assessment programs. Contractors are responsible for establishing
robust, rigorous, and credible ES&H, safeguards and security, and emergency management
assessment programs, integrated with their safety management systems (DOE O 226.1A, DOE O
414.1C and DOE M 450.4-1).
Assessment programs conducted in accordance with this Guide, and appropriately adopted
standards will satisfy the assessment requirements of 10 CFR 830, Subpart A; DOE O 414.1C;
DOE O 226.1A; and DOE M 450.4-1. The Guide, however, does not lessen the requirement to
comply with DOE O 414.1C or 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, including those requirements related to
management and independent assessments. Alternative methods demonstrated to achieve
adequate levels of safety and quality may be acceptable to DOE. This Guide also provides a
basis for determining the adequacy of QA programs and Integrated Safety Management System
(ISMS) descriptions (DOE M 450.4-1 and DOE O 226.1A).
DOE G 414.1-1B 5
9-27-07
3. GENERAL INFORMATION
3.1. Assessment Program Expectations
The development of effective assessment and management programs should focus on achieving
the following DOE expectations:
• Documented assessment programs define the systems that will be used to plan, perform,
and follow up on assessments.
• Responsibilities are defined for both performing and responding to assessments.
• Senior management endorses and actively supports the assessment program and views it
as a value-added process.
• Management at all levels is responsive to any identified issues, regardless of how they are
identified.
• Individuals performing assessments are appropriately trained and qualified in the
assessment process.
• Objective evidence is available to substantiate assessment findings.
• Corrective actions are taken promptly to prevent recurrence.
• Feedback is solicited from management, workers, independent evaluators and customers.
• Measurable organization goals and objectives are identified and progress can be
demonstrated.
3.2. Assessment Benefits
Section 5
The success of an organization depends upon the extent to which its products and services satisfy
customer requirements and expectations. Each member of an organization is responsible for
customer satisfaction. The results-oriented quality program described in 10 CFR 830, Subpart A,
Quality Assurance Requirements (QA Rule) and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance (QA Order)
focuses on customer requirements and expectations, and embraces continuous improvement.
Assessments build confidence that organizations can meet customer expectations and
self-identify areas where improvement is needed and correct problems before they become major
issues or events.
Effective internal assessments prepare an organization for external governmental and
nongovernmental assessments of performance, and conformity with national and international
standards.
6 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Voluntary third-party conformity assessments are conducted by quality/environmental
management system registrars, laboratory accrediters, and product certifiers who evaluate
compliance with national or international standards.
DOE contractors that participate in the Voluntary Protection Program can attain recognition for
excellence in safety and health management. Other national and state quality awards include the
Presidential Award for Quality and the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, which use
comprehensive assessments that focus on integrated management systems and customer service.
Regulatory or oversight bodies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the
Environmental Protection Agency, or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) measure compliance with regulatory requirements, standards, and related commitments
(involuntary third-party assessments). For the NRC and OSHA this represents a relatively small
number of DOE facilities. The benefit of an involuntary third-party assessment is the
confirmation of compliance or noncompliance with regulatory requirements.
An effective assessment process, when coupled with prompt improvements and corrective
actions by management, may be considered a mitigating factor by third party assessors.
Additionally it can reduce the time and frequency of third-party assessments. This translates into
lower conformity assessment service costs for the organization.
3.3. Graded Approach
This Guide and the technical standards referenced herein should be applied using a graded
approach. The graded application is dependent upon the hazards and/or level of risk associated
with the activity or structures, systems, and components under consideration. The scope, depth,
and rigor of assessments should be determined by the use of a grading process before performing
the activity. The purpose of grading is to select assessment activities consistent with their
importance to safety, cost, schedule, and success of the program.
The grading process provides the flexibility to design an assessment that best suits the facility or
activity. The grading process is not used to obtain exemption from the requirements of the QA
Rule or QA Order.
Items, services, or programs that contribute the greatest risk to quality, safety, and mission are
assessed with the greatest rigor and frequency. The grading process is used to determine the
appropriate assessment rigor and is based on activity-specific or facility-specific factors such as:
• relative importance to safety, safeguards, and security;
• magnitude of any hazard or risk involved;
Section 6
• life-cycle stage of a facility or activity;
• impact/consequences on the programmatic mission of a facility;
• unique characteristics of a facility or activity;
DOE G 414.1-1B 7
9-27-07
• nuclear safety classification or hazard category of the item or activity;
• adequacy of existing safety documentation;
• relative importance of radiological and non-radiological hazards;
• complexity of products or services involved;
• performance history of a facility or activity; and
• other relevant factors.
3.4. Purpose of Assessment
Establishing and implementing an effective assessment program is an integral part of every
management system. Assessment is an important feedback mechanism that provides
management with information to evaluate and improve the following:
• organizational progress in reaching strategic goals and objectives;
• adequacy and implementation of management programs for mission achievement;
• performance capability of ISMSs;
• products and service quality; and
• regulatory and contractual compliance.
Simply stated, an assessment is an opportunity to:
• identify the gaps between where you are and where you want to be;
• identify the reasons for the gaps;
• identify the actions that will be taken to close the gaps (corrective actions);
• close the gaps between where you are and where you want to be; and
• verify that corrective actions have been effective and lasting.
3.4.1. Assessment Elements
An assessment program should have the following elements:
• defined roles, responsibilities, authorities, and accountabilities for the staff performing and
responding to assessments;
• documented description, defining the purpose and the processes that will be used to plan,
perform, and follow up on assessments;
8 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
• use of Safety Information Programs (SIPs) to plan and direct assessment resources on ES&H
issues;
• both management and independent assessments;
• performance metrics that reflect the assessment process itself (e.g., customer satisfaction,
value of assessment topics, and findings);
• a process to periodically evaluate the effectiveness of site assessment programs (both
independent and management) in meeting regulatory and management objectives;
• clear links to measurable organizational goals and objectives;
• inclusion of appropriate technical expertise within the assessment team;
• a training program to assure that assessment participants have the proper skills to perform
assessments; and
• assessment results that feed the corrective action system.
The assessment program should be included as part of the Integrated Safety Oversight Plans
(ISOP).
3.5. Types of Assessment
Assessments are tools for improvement. DOE’s QA Rule and QA Order establish distinct
requirements for management and independent assessments. DOE O 226.1A refers to contractor
self-assessment programs that include line and independent evaluations. In this context, the
assessments are those that a contractor conducts on its own ES&H performance. Management
and independent assessments as described in this Guide will satisfy the requirements of DOE O
226.1A.
Contractors should clearly describe in writing how their self-assessment programs satisfy the
requirements for management and/or independent assessment.
Management and Independent Assessments may be performed on the same functions or
organizations; however, each has a specific focus defined by the QA Rule and QA Order as
described below. For some organizations, the only difference between Management and
Independent Assessments may be the actual performer of the assessment.
Section 7
It is essential to clearly define the criteria and/or objectives intended for the assessment through
the assessment planning process and in the Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs).
3.5.1. Management Assessment
Managers perform management assessments to comply with the QA Rule and QA Order and to
improve performance. In general, the purpose of this type of assessment is to identify the
DOE G 414.1-1B 9
9-27-07
management systems, processes, and programs that affect performance and to make
improvements. Management assessments look at the total picture:
• how well the management systems and processes meet the customer’s requirements;
• compliance with standards and requirements;
• meeting the expectations for safely performing work;
• clarity of the organizational mission, goals, and objectives; and
• identifying and correcting problems that hinder the organization from achieving its
objectives.
The emphasis of management assessment is on issues that affect performance, strategic planning,
personnel qualification and training, staffing and skills mix, communication, cost control,
organizational interfaces, and mission objectives.
Management assessment is a periodic introspective self-analysis to determine whether the
organization’s activities are properly focused on achieving desired results. This includes
reviewing the processes, systems, and programs that are important to the organization’s mission
and objectives. Results of management as well as independent assessments can be used, in
addition to formulating approaches and corrective actions for improvements, to develop plans for
the subsequent management assessments. Additionally, independent assessment results may also
be used as the basis for determining the focus and frequency of management assessments. It
should be noted that effective management assessments could result in less frequent independent
assessments, and independent assessment findings could affect the frequency and rigor of
management assessments. In general, management and independent assessments are
complementary; however, management assessments are generally performed at a greater
frequency and cover a broader spectrum than independent assessments.
3.5.2. Independent Assessment
An independent assessment may be an audit, surveillance, “for cause” review or inspection
conducted by individuals within the organization or company but independent from the work or
process being evaluated, or by individuals from an external organization or company. In general,
the purpose of this assessment is to perform the following:
• evaluate compliance with standards and requirements;
• evaluate the performance of work;
• measure the quality of the item or service;
• examine process effectiveness/adequacy; and
• promote improvement.
10 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Figure 1
The organization or staff performing independent assessments should have sufficient authority
and freedom from the line organization to carry out its responsibilities. Individuals should be
technically qualified and knowledgeable in assessment techniques and in the areas being
assessed.
Independent assessments evaluate the performance of work processes with regard to
requirements, compliance, and expectations for safely performing the work and achieving the
goals of the organization. The focus of independent assessments should be the items and
services produced and their associated processes. Thus, management receives an objective view
of the assessed activity. Independent assessments are typically performed less frequently than
management assessments but go into greater depth.
Section 8
Management is responsible for developing and implementing a coherent plan that balances
management and independent assessments and other forms of feedback and improvement to
satisfy the requirements of the QA Rule and QA Order.
3.6. Organizational Activity Levels
To develop a comprehensive assessment program that optimizes the application of each
assessment type, it may be helpful to visualize the organization as having three interlinked levels
of activity (Figure 1). This is not meant to
imply a hierarchy of assessments. For this
discussion, these levels are referred to as
“process,” “system,” and “program.”
Management and independent assessments
can be applied at all three levels, but
examine different aspects of each level.
A process is a collection of steps or actions
that yield some intermediate outcome.
A system is made up of two or more
processes that may operate independently or
interdependently to yield a complete product
or service.
A program is the most complex level, and
consists of multiple interdependent systems
that often require several interfaces to
provide the desired product or service.
3.6.1. Process Level Assessments
Process level assessments involve the examination of work controls, and verification that they
are being implemented effectively, and should assess the effectiveness of the processes from a
quality and customer satisfaction perspective. This level of assessment is critical for ensuring
that the worker, the public, and the environment are protected from harm.
DOE G 414.1-1B 11
9-27-07
At the process level, assessments are performed to verify compliance with procedures and
process objectives or criteria, and to ensure that work-control documents (e.g., procedures,
instructions, radiation surveys, permits, and safety checklists) accurately reflect tasks and their
associated hazards.
3.6.2. System Level Assessments
System level assessments focus on whether the appropriate leadership and support systems are in
place to enable the implementation of work processes, and may range from informal daily
performance oversight to formal periodic evaluations using established protocols. System level
assessments are performed to ensure that human and material resources are being properly
applied to achieve an organization’s mission and objectives. The collection of “processes” that
have been assembled to form an effective “system” is also evaluated.
At the system level, assessments are performed to determine whether all the necessary elements
and interfaces are addressed, and to ensure that the system is capable of consistently meeting
requirements and customer expectations. For example, a management assessment of the work
control system might identify cost and resource allocation issues that affect the system.
Some of the elements within the work control systems that might be assessed are:
• planning the work;
• identifying hazards associated with the work;
• identifying hazard controls;
• scheduling and performing work;
• verifying/testing completed work;
• critiquing work processes and results; and
• documenting the work performed.
3.6.3. Program Level Assessments
Program level assessments are used to determine whether the overall organizational programs are
properly established and implemented, and are used to evaluate complex organizations from
several perspectives. They usually examine the integration of the systems designed to achieve
organizational goals and customer expectations (with an emphasis on ES&H factors).
Section 9
At the program level for example, a maintenance management program, which relies on the work
control system, would use results from the process (i.e., work control documents) and system
level assessments to determine the effectiveness of the entire maintenance program. This
program level assessment could be performed as either a management assessment or an
independent assessment.
12 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
3.7. Assessing for Compliance and Performance
There are two different methods commonly used for accomplishing assessments. These are
usually known as compliance assessment and performance-based assessment. While each
method has distinct characteristics, a good assessment will usually gauge, at some level,
effectiveness of the processes, systems, and programs in meeting the mission and objectives of
the organization. In practice, an assessment is likely to include both compliance and
performance based methods.
3.7.1. Compliance Assessments
Compliance assessments focus on verifying compliance with requirements through the
implementation of procedures, and begin with a determination of the contractual and regulatory
requirements governing the assessed organization. Assessors should become familiar with
requirements and procedures and then verify that requirements flow down to implementing
documents such as procedures, whose implementation is in turn verified.
Assessing for compliance alone may not adequately identify higher-level systemic or
programmatic problems or determine the effectiveness of the program. For example, an
organization may have written procedures that appear to implement the requirements, however,
in practice the intent of those requirements may not be fully achieved because of variables such
as poorly executed procedures.
3.7.2. Performance-Based Assessments
Performance-based assessments take a different approach by focusing first on the adequacy of
the process that produced a product or service, and then on the product itself. If problems are
found in the product or work processes, the assessor evaluates the methods and procedures used
to implement the applicable requirements in an effort to find the failure that led to the problems.
The assessor is expected to determine whether a non-compliance or series of non-compliances
with procedures could result in a failure to satisfy top-level requirements. Results of prior
compliance assessments may help the assessor in determining the focus areas for planning
performance-based assessments.
In performance-based assessments, great emphasis is placed on getting the full story on a
problem before coming to a conclusion. If an assessor sees a problem with the execution of a
welding process, the next step should determine the extent of the problem. Is it limited to one
welder? Is it limited to one process? Can the problem be traced to the qualification program for
the welder or to the qualification program for the welding process? Or is there a problem with
the weld material itself, indicating a problem such as engineering or procurement?
While the assessor should be familiar with requirements and procedures, in performance-based
assessments the assessor’s experience and knowledge play an integral part in determining
whether requirements are satisfied. Therefore, participants in performance-based assessments
should be technically competent in the areas they are assessing. For example, if an assessor is
evaluating a welding process, the assessor relies heavily on his or her knowledge of welding
Section 10
DOE G 414.1-1B 13 (and 14)
9-27-07
codes, welding processes, and metallurgy, rather than just verifying simple procedure
compliance.
Performance-based assessments usually provide the most useful information to management;
however, it requires a much higher level of competence on the part of the assessment team.
Results of performance-based assessments may provide useful insight for management’s pursuit
of excellence.
DOE G 414.1-1B 15
9-27-07
4. GUIDELINES
Organizations should establish procedures for planning and performing management and
independent assessments. These procedures should be a part of the overall assessment program
for the organization. They should address personnel training and qualifications, the assessment
planning processes, performance protocols and tools, reporting, including report distribution,
corrective action development and implementation, and other follow-up activities. The
following guidelines are presented to assist organizations in developing their procedures and
protocols.
Management assessments share procedural and protocol commonalities with Independent
Assessments. Because of this, the organization should ensure that assessment procedures are
well defined and integrated, while maintaining the separate and unique focuses of the two types
of assessments. For example, management and independent assessments look at the results of
internal and external assessments to determine compliance with defined system requirements.
Management assessments; however, also need to focus on how well the system is meeting
organizational objectives and achieving improvement goals.
4.1. Assessment Personnel
Assessment personnel facilitate continuous process improvement by identifying ways programs,
systems, and processes can be improved and by providing information to management and
process owners. The assessor should be able to collect performance data through interviews,
document reviews, observation, and inspection. It is very important that the assessor also be able
to communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, and demonstrate effective interpersonal
skills.
Both management and independent assessments should be performed by qualified individuals
who are knowledgeable about the program, system, or process being assessed and have been
trained to ensure full understanding of the assessment processes, including reporting.
Individuals performing independent assessments should not currently perform, supervise, or be
directly responsible for performing the activities being assessed. Independence is determined
based on an individual not having bias, rather than on organizational affiliation. The
independent assessor should have both the personal and organizational freedom to communicate
with the management of the assessed organizations.
Organizations should establish a formal training and qualification programs for assessors,
including both assessment team leaders and team members, that reflects both regulatory and
customer requirements. Organizations may adopt third-party personnel qualification programs
such as the American Society for Quality’s “Quality Auditor Certification”
(http://www.asq.org/certification/index.html) or the Registrar Accreditation Board’s certification
program (http://www.rabqsa.com/). The International Organization for Standardization and the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) provide additional guidance for training
and qualification of assessors (ISO-19011 and ASME NQA-1 respectively). For assessments of
nuclear facilities and activities, ASME NQA-1 is the appropriate national standard to be used by
DOE and contractor organizations for guidance on training of assessment personnel. At a
Section 11
16 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
minimum, however, training and qualification programs should be based on a recognized,
relevant standard such as (DOE-STD-1150-2002, Quality Assurance Functional Area
Qualification Standard).
Effective assessments may be accomplished through the use of an assessment team with
combined skills and experiences. Training for assessors should address the policies and
procedures of the assessing organization. To enhance assessment performance and capability,
new assessment personnel should participate in on-the-job training with qualified, experienced
assessors before being considered fully trained or receiving a required qualification. Further
guidance on assessor training and qualification is provided in DOE Orders and Guides, and the
standards in Appendix A.
4.2. Assessment Program Planning
4.2.1. Assessment Programs
Assessment programs should be developed to the level of rigor and detail required to ensure
adequate review of programs, systems, and processes. An assessment program provides the
structure for the overall process and ensures that assessments are conducted in a cost-effective,
efficient manner. Items considered essential for a comprehensive assessment program include
the following:
• assessment scheduling, planning
approach, and logic (including how
management and independent
assessments are balanced);
• methodology for
determining/developing performance
criteria;
• recognition and use of third-party
assessment results (accreditation,
certification, registration, and
regulatory);
• assessment ethics and behaviors;
• qualification and training of
assessment team personnel;
• protocols for conduct, including
interfaces and meetings;
• format/review of assessment plans and agendas;
DOE G 414.1-1B 17
9-27-07
• reporting methods/procedures for concerns, findings, observations, and improvement
opportunities, including distribution, and mechanisms for addressing imminent danger
issues;
• procedures/processes for concern verification and follow–up;
• assessment records management program, including identification of records that will be
retained, retention periods, and protection; and
• central repository or website to ensure that assessment supporting documentation (e.g.,
assessment plans, corrective action plans, transmittal letters, etc.) can be retrieved.
Assessments should be conducted commensurate with the hazards, status, and importance of
the program goals, systems, or work processes and should be focused on worker health and
safety, public health and safety, environmental protection, community concern, strategic
planning, organizational resources, compliance and liability, and business efficiency and
productivity. Complexity, reliability, risk, and economic issues should also be considered
when planning and scheduling assessments. The application of a graded approach using a
risk-based decision-making process will ensure that resources are applied in a manner that
provides the greatest benefit to the assessed organizations and their customers.
4.2.2. Management Assessment Planning
Management assessments should be planned in a systematic manner by the individual
managers at each level of management, to evaluate the effectiveness and adequacy of their
management systems. Assessments should be planned with appropriate consideration for
other management and/or independent assessments that could conflict with or duplicate their
efforts (see Section 4.3). Management should retain overall responsibility for the planning and
performance of management assessments, and the results of the planning process should be
documented in an assessment plan. The following items should be evaluated:
Section 12
• how well management is providing the leadership to enable an organization to continuously
meet internal and external customer requirements and expectations;
• processes and their effectiveness, internally and across organizational boundaries,
including ensuring that the staff is receiving the support to do their work (training,
procedures, tools, and cooperation from others; and
• performance information from other assessments (Independent, Self, and External
Assessments including financial, employee feedback systems, customer surveys, etc.).
Management assessment planning should include the mechanics of performing the assessment
such as the expected time-frame, assessment tools that may be used, reporting requirements,
and how areas for improvement will be identified, tracked, and closed (see Section 4.8 for
additional information).
18 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
4.2.3. Independent Assessment Planning
The level of planning for an independent assessment will vary significantly depending on scope,
breadth, and complexity of the system or process being assessed. The planning process should
provide for input from the assessed organizations and consideration of their customers’ and
stakeholders’ needs, requirements and expectations. Specific budget requirements and required
support should be identified as early in the planning process as possible.
Administrative issues that need to be anticipated and addressed prior to the site visit typically
include:
• requests for documentation;
• travel planning;
• security clearances;
• access privileges;
• facility authorizations;
• site logistics; and
• points of contact.
There are various scheduling and planning approaches to satisfying these requirements.
Appendix C describes tools to aid in assessment planning and Appendix D provides an example
of how to plan and schedule independent assessments using an integrated, risk-based approach.
4.2.4. Planning Updates
Required assessments should be planned and completed within a reasonable period of time.
Assessment planning should be reviewed and modified periodically as new information about the
facility or organization is obtained. An assessment that finds good performance should be used
as justification for reducing the depth and frequency of future assessments. The frequency of
assessments may also be reduced based on good performance unless the frequency is established
by a requirement (e.g., DOE O 151.1C). Areas of poor performance should receive increased
attention, especially if there are indications that management is unable to correct the identified
problems, because recurring and cumulative deficiencies, even in low-hazard operations, may
decrease the likelihood of successfully achieving the mission.
4.3. Assessment Integration
Routine communication and trust among the various assessment bodies is essential when
coordinating assessment plans. This task involves identifying overlapping and redundant
assessments to reduce their negative impact on work performance. Once identified, assessments
should be coordinated and consolidated in several ways.
DOE G 414.1-1B 19
9-27-07
• Assessment scope should be coordinated and integrated to prevent multiple assessment
organizations from performing similar assessments on the same subject.
• Separate assessment teams may be combined to evaluate the subject in a single visit.
• Assessments may be canceled based on agreements to share the results of other assessments.
Section 13
Where significant redundancies exist, as when contractors perform Supplier Quality Assessments
of analytical laboratory services, the recognition and use of accredited third-party assessment
results and/or shared information from other contractors should be considered. Each of these
methods requires staff time to develop, implement, and manage; however, they can result in
substantial resource savings while enhancing the ability of the assessing organization to cover a
greater number of activities. Having an integrated assessment schedule including management
and independent assessments will assist the organization controlling overlapping and duplicate
assessments to minimize impact to organizations. Additionally, consider developing a multi-year
assessment schedule (along with a current year schedule) to identify the total scope of all
required assessments. This multi-year schedule could be utilized in a rolling fashion. This will
facilitate resource identification, resource leveling, and allow for reconciliation from
year-to-year. Assessment schedules are meant to be living documents that are adjusted
periodically based on the analysis of operational awareness information, and the results of
internal and external assessment activities.
4.4. Assessment Plan
The use and level of detail of an assessment plan will vary depending on what is being assessed,
and whether the assessment is a management or independent assessment. Plans are used to scope
and plan individual assessments, and should include input not only from the assessed
organizations but also from their customers. A documented assessment plan not only allows
expectations to be communicated to the assessed organization, but also allows the assessment
team to focus its activities more effectively. The scope of the assessment should be defined in
terms related to the assessed organization’s mission and goals so the focus and value of the
assessment will be clearly understood. The level of detail included in the assessment plan should
be commensurate with the protocols of both the assessed and assessing organizations. The
assessment plan should include the following items:
• team members and their qualifications and biographies;
• description of the assessment scope and performance criteria;
• dates of the assessment;
• schedule of assessment meetings-pre-assessment, daily, and post-assessment;
• list of documents to be provided to the assessment team upon arrival;
• requests for office space, phone lines, computers, and other administrative support as
required;
20 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
• requests for site-specific training, dosimetry, and access requirements; and
• request for points-of-contact for each functional area.
The organization being assessed should be contacted and provided with the assessment plan as
early as possible before the assessment (unless regulations or contracts specify other contact
protocols).
Management or independent assessments in smaller organizations may not involve as much
information as that listed above, nor the degree of formality required for assessments performed
by external organizations. It is important to remember that each assessment needs to evaluate a
program, system, or process during a finite time period.
4.5. Performance Criteria
Section 14
Assessments seek to ensure that performance expectations defined by management and process
owners are being met. Assessors should clearly understand the programs, systems, or processes
being assessed, including their goals, and associated objectives and requirements for efficient,
effective performance of operations. Performance requirements can be found in the following
source documents:
• federal and state regulatory requirements;
• appropriate codes and standards;
• contract requirements;
• DOE Orders, Manuals, and Notices;
• implementation plans;
• implementation procedures;
• facility safety documents;
• policy and mission statements;
• DOE-approved “Work Smart” standards ;
• standards/requirements identification documents (S/RIDs);
• plans and programs;
• management, business, operating and/or strategic plans; and
• applicable standards, permits, authorizations and regulatory agreements.
DOE G 414.1-1B 21
9-27-07
Much information about performance and additional performance requirements may be available
to assessors in existing documents and reports, such as:
• reports from outside regulators;
• facility operations/activity/metrics reports;
• performance reviews;
• previous assessment reports, including self-assessment reports;
• internal inspections, reviews, and reports;
• corrective action plans and status reports;
• concerns and occurrence reports;
• performance indicators;
• monitoring and survey data, and modeling data and analyses; and
• Price-Anderson Amendments Act Nonconformance Tracking System reports
(http://www.hss.energy.gov/enforce/).
Requirements contained in these documents are selected based upon impact on the assessed
organization’s mission and the relationship to the scope of the assessment. From selected
requirements, objective statements (performance measures) are developed for determining
whether a program, system, or process is working efficiently and effectively. From these
measures, the specific performance criteria (based on written programs, DOE Orders, Rules, etc.)
are developed and tools selected for conducting the assessments. In developing performance
criteria, assessment personnel should not reinterpret or redefine requirements specified in the
source documents. It is critical for a successful assessment that the requirements are understood
and clearly explained in the assessment documentation.
4.6. Assessment Planning Tools
Assessment planning tools such as checklists are an essential element of an effective assessment.
They vary in format, content, and level of detail, but all have one thing in common: they help
focus the assessor on the mission and objectives of the program, system, or process being
assessed. Application of planning tools before an assessment ensures that time will be used
effectively and that the assessment’s focus is identified and maintained. Assessment planning
tools are often used to relate the performance criteria to the established assessment scope and
may include lists of interview questions, major elements of programs, or detailed process work
steps. Similar to a road map, each tool is used to remind the assessor of where he/she is going
and the items likely to be encountered along the way. Planning tools are extremely useful when
the assessment basis is complex or the requirements come from multiple sources. Typical
planning tools include matrices, flowcharts, cause-effect diagrams, tree diagrams, checklists,
22 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Section 15
CRADs, and information systems. (See Appendix C for examples and further discussion of
these tools. An example of a QA CRAD can be found at
http://www.hss.energy.gov/CSA/CSP/qa/QA_CRAD.html)
4.7. Independent Assessment Process
As discussed previously, there are commonalities shared by management and independent
assessments. To avoid unnecessary duplication, the following sections of this Guide are very
detailed, pointing out areas where the two assessment types differ. Section 4.8 is a briefer
discussion concentrating on elements unique to management assessments. Appendix D provides
additional insight and guidance for independent assessment planning.
4.7.1. Pre-assessment Meetings
The effectiveness and efficiency of independent assessments can be improved greatly if
representatives of the assessment team meet informally with key members of the assessed
organization. This should be done at least a week before the assessment fieldwork actually
begins. Pre-assessment meetings are particularly useful when the assessment team is completely
external to the organization being assessed. It is recommended that these meetings be used to
confirm that there is a common understanding between the assessing organization, the assessed
organization, and the customer of the independent assessment (DOE program or field office
management), of the criteria and/or performance measures. These meetings are also an
opportunity to clarify the assessment team’s plan and to work out logistical problems. The
assessment team should identify and schedule the individuals to be interviewed so that
arrangements can be made to ensure their availability. Documents that require extra effort to
retrieve can be identified in advance, and the requirements for assessment team work space can
be resolved.
4.7.2. The Entrance Meeting
An entrance meeting involving personnel from the assessing organization and the managers of
the organization being assessed, is held immediately before the assessment fieldwork begins to
“set the stage” for a positive and productive independent assessment. This meeting is usually
held at the assessed organization’s location/facility and allows the assessment team to meet the
assessed organization’s managers and answer any questions they may have about the assessment.
This meeting is also used to establish how concerns involving imminent danger or regulatory
non-compliance will be communicated. The protocols to be followed during the assessment
should be clarified during the entrance meeting, including discussions of the following:
• purpose and scope of the assessment, including authority for conducting the assessment;
• assessed organization’s mission, program, systems, and processes;
• scheduled duration of the assessment;
DOE G 414.1-1B 23
9-27-07
• source documents and performance information that form the basis for the performance
criteria to be used;
• a list of knowledgeable individuals from the assessed organization as “points of contact” for
each assessor;
• any restrictions on the collection and/or disposal of assessment notes/records by the
assessors;
• logistics, including work area, working hours, lunch hours, etc.;
• time and location of periodic status meetings; and
• time and place of the post assessment meeting.
4.7.3. Performing Independent Assessments
Section 16
The assessment should be conducted in accordance with established protocols developed by the
assessing organization. Site/facility protocols should be followed for what to do if an imminent
danger situation or a reportable noncompliance or violation is encountered during the course of
an assessment. Any assessment schedules or specific protocols established during the
pre-assessment meeting are used to ensure that the assessment is conducted effectively and
safely. Assessors should keep their points of contact informed of their activities to preclude
surprises during the post-assessment conference. This may include requests for additional
assistance or the communication of concerns that require immediate action on the part of the
assessed organization. Timely communication, verbal and written, will allow the assessed
organization to verify the accuracy of observations and provide relevant facts and background on
the issues. One way to accomplish this is to meet periodically (daily or every other day) with the
organization being assessed to convey questions/concerns and provide a status update.
Daily team meetings may be helpful in ensuring continuity and overall focus by providing
assessment team leaders with information about the completion status of the assessment
checklists, and offering the opportunity for inquiry into issues requiring additional action (e.g.,
clearances, access, requests for personnel or material, and impasse resolution). These meetings
also provide the setting for advising other team members of issues that may be of interest in their
assigned scope, or for integrating data gathered by the various assessors. The meetings should
be brief so that they do not significantly reduce the team members’ field time with the processes
they are to assess and the people they are to interview.
It is important that sufficient information be gathered during the assessment to determine
whether an activity meets the performance criteria established. The assessor should be able to
state clearly the criterion impacted by the activity and whether identified findings impact the
mission/goals of the organization. To accomplish this, the assessor may deviate from the
assessment schedule to determine the extent and significance of an issue. Deviations that affect
24 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
the assessor’s ability to complete the assessment team’s interview schedule should immediately
be made known to the organization being assessed and the team leader.
4.7.4. Independent Assessment Techniques
Effective assessments use a combination of tools and techniques to maximize the productivity of
the assessment team and resources. Such assessment techniques include interviews, document
reviews, observation, inspection, and performance testing. The planning tools discussed in
Appendix C also allow for more complex analysis and systematic coverage of the areas being
assessed. In using these techniques, the assessor should not forget that the objective is to verify
accomplishment of an organization’s mission. To save time, the assessor should gather only data
and information relevant to overall program performance and the achievement of program
objectives. Assessments should be thorough and information gathered with sufficient diligence
such that accurate, detailed conclusions can be provided to the organizations that will receive the
final report.
Section 17
When using any of these techniques, assessors should maintain good records of the assessment
results. These may include personal notes or other information to support the assessment, and
may be included in the checklist information. These records are useful in writing the report, and
any associated findings and recommendations, and will be valuable if questions arise during the
report review process. All classified notes should be disposed of properly in accordance with
established and agreed-upon procedures. A discussion of each of the techniques follows.
4.7.4.1. Interviews provide the means of verifying the results of observation, document
review, inspection, and performance testing; allow the responsible person to explain
and clarify those results; help to eliminate misunderstandings about program
implementation; and provide a venue where apparent conflicts or recent changes can
be discussed and organization and program expectations can be described.
4.7.4.2. Document Reviews provide the objective evidence to substantiate compliance with
applicable requirements. A drawback is that the accuracy of the records cannot be
ascertained by review alone. This technique should be combined with interviews,
observation, inspection, and/or performance testing to complete the performance
picture. Records and documents should be selected carefully to ensure that they
adequately characterize the program, system, or process being assessed.
4.7.4.3. Observation, the viewing of actual work activities is often considered the most
effective technique for determining whether performance is in accordance with
requirements. Assessors should understand the effect their presence has on the
person being observed and convey an attitude that is helpful, constructive, positive,
and unbiased. The primary goal during observation is to obtain the most complete
picture possible of the performance, which should then be put into perspective
relative to the overall program, system, or process.
4.7.4.4. Inspections are performed in accordance with acceptance criteria to verify the
condition of physical facilities, systems, equipment, and components.
DOE G 414.1-1B 25
9-27-07
4.7.4.5. Performance Testing is used to observe the response of personnel or equipment by
creating a specific situation and noting the resulting performance. This technique is
especially helpful when activities of interest would not normally occur during an
assessment visit. It is also useful when the timeliness and appropriateness of the
response are critical (e.g., emergency responses).
4.7.5. The Exit Meeting
This meeting is used primarily by the assessment team to present the assessment summary.
Reasonable time should be allowed to discuss any concerns, but this meeting should not be used
to argue the assessment findings or methodology. There should be no surprises during the exit
meeting since the assessment team should have taken every effort possible during the conduct of
the assessment to ensure that the assessed organization was aware of the team’s findings and
concerns. Prior to the exit meeting the assessment team should consider combining related
findings into a small number of well-supported findings to help focus management’s
opportunities for improvement.
4.7.6. Assessment Reporting
Section 18
Assessment reports are required for documentation of assessment results. Assessment team
leaders have the overall responsibility for preparing the report and obtaining appropriate
approval for its release as applicable. The report may be formal (e.g., distributed by
memorandum) or informal (e.g., letter to file or email), depending on the level of assessment
performed, but should provide a clear picture of the results in terms of the programs, systems,
and processes assessed. The assessment report should be clear, concise, accurate, and easy to
understand, and should include only facts that directly relate to assessment observations and
results. It should include sufficient information to enable the assessed organization to develop
and implement appropriate improvement plans.
Specific report formats may vary considerably from one organization to the next. An
independent assessment report usually includes the sections described below. (Note: A
management assessment report may not require all of the content listed below and may only
require an executive summary.)
4.7.6.1. Assessment Report Content
• executive summary;
• assessment scope;
• identification of team members;
• identification of personnel contacted;
• documents reviewed;
• work performance observed;
26 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
• assessment process and criteria (e.g. CRADs); and
• results of the assessment including identification of areas for improvement, and/or
strengths.
4.7.7. Releasing and Responding to Assessment Reports
While team leaders have overall responsibility for the report, the entire assessment team should
have an opportunity to read and sign the completed report. At a minimum, the final report
should be distributed to the management of both the assessed and assessing organizations.
Distribution to other organizations (e.g., Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board or other
regulators) should be defined during the planning phase and communicated in advance to the
assessed group.
Because the true value of an assessment is the improvement opportunities it identifies, and its
value typically diminishes over time, the best time to release a report is immediately after the
post-assessment meeting, which allows the assessed organization to begin improvement actions,
yielding the maximum return for those actions.
The assessment report or transmittal correspondence should clearly indicate what response is
expected from the assessed organization and a reasonable response date.
4.7.8. Corrective Actions
Managers responsible for the activities assessed are also responsible for the development of
effective corrective actions for the problem areas/deficiencies discovered during the assessment.
At a minimum, these corrective actions should include the following:
• measures to correct each deficiency;
• identification of all root causes for significant deficiencies;
• determination of the existence of similar deficiencies or underlying causes (i.e., extent of
condition, extent of cause);
• actions to preclude recurrence of like or similar deficiencies;
• assignment of corrective action responsibility; and
• completion dates for each corrective action.
Managers should verify that corrective actions are likely to fully address the identified deficiency
and when actions are completed, validate that the actions have corrected the deficiency.
Specific, detailed requirements (DOE O 414.1C and DOE O 470.2B, Independent Oversight and
Performance Assurance Program) and guidance (DOE G 450.4-1B, Integrated Safety
Management System Guide, Vol. 2, Appendix G, and DOE G 414.1-5, Corrective Action
Section 19
DOE G 414.1-1B 27
9-27-07
Program Guide) exist for responding to assessments conducted by the Department’s independent
oversight organization.
4.7.9. Follow-up Assessments
A follow-up assessment with special focus may be performed and should be completed in
accordance with applicable corrective action documents. Particularly, this follow-up assessment
should evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions. A reasonable subset of corrective actions
should be reviewed for effectiveness
Several DOE special focus assessments also include verification steps: DOE G 450.4-1B,
Integrated Safety Management System Guide, Vol. 2, Appendix G; DOE-STD-3006-2000,
Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR); and Office of Independent
Oversight Environment, Safety, and Health, Safeguards and Security, and Emergency
Management Appraisal Process Protocols. See Appendix A, “Consensus Standards and
References.”
4.8. Management Assessment Process
Management assessments are a tool used by managers to identify and resolve issues that
contribute to success or failure in fulfilling mission, goals, requirements, or expectations. During
management assessments, focus should be on evaluating system performance issues and related
processes such as personnel skills, communications, cost control, and other similar processes.
Some sites have identified management assessment subject matter experts (SME) typically
within the central assessment organization who have responsibility for reviewing the
management assessments performed by the various program and division managers within the
organization. The SMEs provide feedback as to how well the various management assessments
are meeting company expectations, areas for improvement, etc. This helps to alleviate one of the
deficiencies typically associated with management assessments; inconsistencies in the scope and
effectiveness of such assessments across the organization.
Planning management assessments is an organization-specific effort that should be integrated
with other assessment processes. No single method is appropriate for every situation. Either
quantitative or qualitative assessment methods may be used as appropriate to the assessment
scope. Managers are challenged to make the assessment a value-added process that will lead to
improvement in organizational performance, safety, meeting customer expectations, and
achieving mission goals in full compliance with regulatory and DOE requirements. It is
important to remember that while management assessments share some commonalities with
audits, they should focus on evaluating organizational performance and identifying barriers that
hinder improved performance.
The levels of formality and scope of management assessments can vary greatly. For example, at
the informal extreme of this range, a manager may evaluate the skills of personnel involved in a
single work function and document the need for additional training or staffing levels adjustments
through a memorandum. At the formal extreme, an assessment team made up of senior managers
and process consultants from outside the organization, can perform an extensive evaluation of an
entire organization using checklists, interviews, document reviews, work observations, and
28 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
objective evidence evaluation, followed by the issuance of a formal report. Appendix D provides
additional insight and guidance on management assessment planning, performance and reporting.
Section 20
4.8.1. Defining the System
The organization should have a written description of the management assessment process. The
description should address all elements of the process including, but not limited to, the following:
• management levels that will be expected to perform assessments;
• general goals of the management assessment process;
• training or mentoring that will be provided to assessing managers;
• expectations for the number and frequency of assessments to be performed;
• expectations and guidelines for management assessment reports;
• reporting and follow-up processes;
• interfaces with other oversight programs and processes (e.g., the corrective action reporting
and tracking process);
• management assessment planning process; and
• administration of the process.
4.8.2. Assessment Scheduling
Schedules for management assessments need to be established with the expected frequency of
assessment performance specified. However, scheduling of management assessments should be as
flexible as possible to meet operational and management needs.
The organization should review and update its management assessment schedule on a regular
basis, either bi-monthly or quarterly, to ensure relevance. The review should consider the current
conditions, conclusions of recent management assessments, inputs for independent assessments,
and organizational performance.
Management assessments should be planned with input from all levels of management. Some
organizations have found it beneficial to schedule the number of assessments, but leave the
determination of the topics/areas of assessment to the performing manager, thus providing
flexibility and the freedom to perform assessments that will result in the greatest opportunity for
improvement.
The planning process may include and take credit for the existing management reviews or similar
assessments that routinely occur, such as the following:
• program reviews;
DOE G 414.1-1B 29 (and 30)
9-27-07
• strategic planning sessions;
• reviews of performance indicators;
• reviews of organizational goals-setting and objective-setting sessions;
• financial reviews;
• reviews of the outputs of improvement teams; and
• reviews of independent assessments.
Management assessments may include some benchmarking activities, both internal and against
other organizations. The assessment of internal and external performance indicators may also be
beneficial. There is no fixed number of assessments to be performed; however, the organization
should be able to show that the management assessment program complies with the QA Rule and
QA Order.
4.8.3. Performing Management Assessments
Management assessments may be performed by individual managers or teams of managers. The
primary responsibility for management assessments resides with managers because they are in the
best position to identify barriers to improved performance and to effect changes. While some
aspects of the assessments, such as collecting information, may be delegated to staff, it is the
manager’s responsibility to perform the assessment and determine the conclusions. Personal
involvement by the manager will yield the most meaningful information for improving the
performance of the organization.
Although the primary purpose of a management assessment is not verification of compliance with
regulatory or DOE requirements, occasionally a condition is found that is a violation of
programmatic requirements. When this happens, the appropriate oversight organizations should be
notified and corrective action processes implemented.
Section 21
Refer to Appendix D for additional guidance on performance methods.
4.8.4. Assessment Reporting
Management assessments should be reported in accordance with the organization’s assessment
program. As with independent assessment reports, management assessment reports should include
a concise summary of the topics or areas assessed, the conclusions reached, and any follow-up
actions that may be required. Reports should be available for use by others and for future
planning. Special provisions may be required for reports dealing with sensitive areas, proprietary
information, or classified information. Assessments identifying potential regulatory compliance
issues should be communicated directly to the appropriate managers for any necessary action as
well as in the final assessment report. Refer to Appendix D for additional guidance on report
content.
DOE G 414.1-1B A-1
9-27-07
APPENDIX A—CONSENSUS STANDARDS AND REFERENCES
A.1 Consensus Standards
The following are some of the consensus standards that provide methods for implementing the
guidance contained herein. A single standard may not fully implement all elements of the
requirements (particularly for management assessments); therefore, these documents should be
used in conjunction with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance, to
develop and implement assessment processes that meet DOE assessment requirements. The
organization remains responsible for compliance with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, and DOE O
414.1C.
1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Nuclear Society (ANS)
3.2-1994 (R1999), Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational
Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.
2. ANSI/ANS 15.8-1995 R2005, Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Research
Reactors.
3. ANSI/ASQ (American Society for Quality) Z 1.13-1999, Quality Guidelines for
Research.
4. ANSI/ASQC (American Society for Quality Control) E4-2004, Quality Systems
Requirements for Environmental Data and Technology Programs.
5. ANSI/ISO (International Organization for Standardization)/ASQ Q9001:2000, Quality
Management Systems: Requirements. (Note: ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9000 series documents
are recognized as being identical to their ISO 9000 series counterparts.)
6. ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) NQA-1-2000, Quality Assurance
Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications.
7. ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) NQA-1-2004, Quality Assurance
Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications.
8. DOE-HDBK-1101-04, Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals,
February 2004.
9. DOE-HDBK-3027-99, Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS) Verification;
Team Leader’s Handbook, June 1999.
10. DOE-NE-STD-1004-92, Root Cause Analysis Guidance Document, February 1992.
11. DOE-STD-1036-93; Guide to Good Practices for Independent Verification, June 1993
(and Change Notice 1, dated December 1998).
12. DOE-STD-3006-2000, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR),
June 2000.
A-2 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
13. ISO 14012-96, Guidelines for Environmental Auditing–Qualification Criteria for
Environmental Auditors, 1996.
14. ANSI/ISO/ASQ QE 19011S-2004, Guidelines on Quality and/or Environmental
Management Systems Auditing. May 2004
15. DOE-STD-1150-2002, Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard
16. DOE-STD-1172-2003, Safety Software Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification
Standard
A.2 Other References
Section 22
The following references provide additional information concerning assessments.
1. DOE O 151.1C, Comprehensive Emergency Management System
2. DOE G 414.1-2A, Quality Assurance Management System Guide for Use with
10 CFR 830.120 and DOE O 414.1.
3. DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Quality Assurance Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830.120
and DOE O 414.1
4. DOE/RW-0333P,Quality Assurance Requirements and Description [for the Civilian
Radioactive Waste Management Program], Rev. 18, Section 18.0, “Audits,” Office of
Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, October 2006
http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/documents/qard/48027/index.htm
5. DOE G 450.4-1B, Integrated Safety Management System Guide, vols. 1 and 2, dated
3-1-01.
6. DOE, Office of Independent Oversight, Environment, Safety, and Health, Safeguards and
Security, and Emergency Management Appraisal Process Protocols,
http://www.hss.doe.gov/IndepOversight/docs.html
7. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
“Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria for Performance Excellence”
http://www.quality.nist.gov.
8. DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy, dated
7-31-07.
9. DOE O 450.1 Chg 3, Environmental Protection Program, dated 1-15-03.
10. DOE O 470.2B, Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Program. dated
10-31-02.
11. QC-1 Rev. 10, Nuclear Weapons Quality Policy.
DOE G 414.1-1B A-3 (and A-4)
9-27-07
12. Quality Assurance Criteria Review and Approach Documents
http://www.hss.energy.gov/csa/csp/qa/
13. Safety Software Quality Assurance Criteria Review and Approach Documents
http://www.hss.energy.gov/CSA/CSP/sqa/assessments.htm
14. The Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence Handbook, 3rd edition:
Russell T. Westcott, editor; ASQ Quality Press 2005.
DOE G 414.1-1B B-1
9-27-07
APPENDIX B—ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONAL AREAS
This appendix lists environment, safety, and health (ES&H) functional areas, as well as
safeguards and security and emergency management activities that should be included in a
comprehensive assessment program. The list represents basic ES&H requirements, processes,
and programs found in regulations, DOE policy, and DOE Orders. This appendix should not be
construed as limiting assessments to only these functional areas, nor should it be interpreted as
minimizing the importance of assessing product/service quality and organizational performance.
It does, however, illustrate the wide variety of ES&H programs, systems, and processes currently
implemented by DOE and its contractors. These ES&H functional areas comprise a complex
mix of people, hardware, software, and resources, all impacting on management and
performance of activities. An integrated assessment program should be adaptable to this mix in
order to be responsive to senior management needs and comply with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A,
and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance.
• Accelerator Safety
• Accident, Incident, and Unusual
Occurrence Investigation and
Reporting Process
• Aviation Safety
• Biological Hazards
• Calibration Control
• Chemical Safety (process safety
management)
• Computer Software Control
• Conduct of Operations
• Configuration Control
• Construction Safety
• Criticality Control
• Corrective Action
• Dissenting Professional Opinion
Program
• DOE Nuclear Safety Rule
Compliance (10 CFR 830)
• Document Control and Records
• Electrical Safety
• Emergency Management
• Employee Assistance Program
• Employee Concerns System
• Engineering Design Processes
• Environmental Management Systems
• Environmental Protection and NEPA
Section 23
Compliance
• Equipment Modifications
• Experimental Programs
• Explosives Safety
• Facility Operations
• Fire Protection
• Firearms Safety
• Hoisting and Rigging
• Identification & Control of Items
• Industrial Hygiene
• Industrial Safety
• Inspection & Test Control
• Integrated Safety Management
System Implementation
• Lessons Learned Processes
• Maintenance Management
• Motor-Carrier/Vehicle Safety
• Non-conformance Control
• Nuclear Facility Safety
• Occupational Medicine
• Occurrence Reporting/Trending
• Operational Readiness Review
Process
• Packaging and Transportation
• Performance Measures and
Indicators
• Pollution Prevention
• Pressure Systems
• Procurement & Contracts (including
supplier control)
• Quality Management Systems
• Radiation Protection (10 CFR 835)
• Reactor Safety
B-2 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
• Safeguards and Security
• Safety Management Systems
• Safety Basis Documentation (e.g.,
Bases for Interim Operation, hazard
analyses, and safety analysis reports)
• Software Quality Assurance
• Standards/Requirements
Identification Documents(s)
• Suspect/Counterfeit Items
• Technical Safety Requirements
• Training of Nuclear Facility
Personnel
• Un-reviewed Safety Questions
Process
• Voluntary Protection System
• Waste Management
• Waste Minimization
• Welding
• Work Planning and Control
• Worker Protection/Industrial Safety
DOE G 414.1-1B C-1
9-27-07
APPENDIX C—TOOLS FOR ASSESSMENT PLANNING AND CONDUCT
C.1 Checklists
Checklists (Example C.1) are lists of assessment objectives and performance criteria. They
usually include a column for the requirements (or references to the requirements) and a column
for recording assessment observations/evidence. Checklists are especially useful for organizing
assessment time, keeping the assessment focused, and providing a means to list appraisal
objectives sequentially. They may also be structured in a form that can easily be converted into
an assessment report.
Example C.1 Laboratory Calibration Program Checklist
Lab/Appraisal Number: Date: Page 1 of
Results
Reference Criteria Sat Unsat Comments
NL-QAM 1. Is monitoring and data collection
equipment calibrated?
NL-QAM
2. Is equipment calibration traceable
to nationally recognized
standards?
NL-QA-5.1
3. Is equipment calibration
performed using approved
instructions?
NL-QA-5.1
4. Are calibration records
maintained for each piece of
equipment?
NL-QA-5.1 5. Is a use log maintained?
In Example C.1, the checklist is used to list the primary elements of a laboratory’s calibration
program. The basis or source of each criterion is included in the first column to provide a path
back to the requirements document(s). The “comments” column provides a place for the
assessor to record additional observations as they are discovered during the assessment, thus
helping to ensure that important data is not lost.
C.2 Matrices
Matrices (Examples C.2 and C.3) are two-dimensional tables showing the relationship between
two sets of information. They can be used to show the logical connecting points between
performance criteria and implementing or required actions, and personnel responsible for those
actions. In this way, matrices are used to determine what actions and/or personnel have the
C-2 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
greatest impact on an organization’s mission. Matrices are especially useful as a way to focus
assessment time and organize assessment conduct.
Example C.2 Organizational Responsibilities Matrix
Section 24
Program
Development
Deficiency
Tracking Training
Work
Control
Documents &
Records Retention Assessment
Director X X
Ops Office X X X
Ops
Support X X X
Tech
Support X X X X
Admin X X
In Example C.2, the matrix is used to help the assessor plan the assessment by identifying
organizational responsibilities for the different assessment areas. This type of matrix is used to
maximize use of assessment time during the site visit.
Example C.3 Long-Range Planning Matrix
Administration Chemistry Biology Materials
Building
Services Engineering
Industrial
Hygiene A A A A
Radiological
Protection B B B
Fire Protection A C C C C
Industrial
Safety A C A
Environmental C A C C
Personnel
Training B C B C
Conduct of
Operations C C C
Quality
Assurance A C A C
Example C.3 is a much broader use of the matrix that allows the assessor to do the long-range
planning necessary for ensuring proper application of the assessment program. In this example,
the various assessment areas (Y axis) are correlated with the different organizations to be
assessed.
DOE G 414.1-1B C-3
9-27-07
C.3 Flowcharts
Flowcharts (Figure C.1) illustrate the steps or activities in a process. They provide an excellent
tool for examining how various steps in a process are related to each other and whether or not
each subsequent activity is receiving what it needs from the previous one. Flowcharts are used
to help the assessor understand how a function is being implemented based on written programs
and procedures. Flowcharts also illustrate reporting relationships and indicate whether the
handoff of information or materials is adequate. They are especially useful for locating process
bottlenecks, which may hinder the organization’s mission.
In Figure C.1, the flowchart diagrams the steps in the design process, which helps identify
critical areas and determine whether an individual step affects the design process output. In
addition, this flowchart may allow the assessor to divide the design assessment between different
visits while ensuring overall coverage.
C.4 Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
Cause-and-effect diagrams (Figure C.2) illustrate the relationship between a known “effect” or
outcome and all the “causes” or contributors influencing it. The effect being examined may
represent either a wanted or unwanted outcome. The cause-and-effect diagram is used when the
outcome of a process/program is known but the contributors need to be evaluated further. These
diagrams are especially useful when the contributors stem from different sources across the
organization being assessed.
Figure C.1
C-4 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
In this example, the assessor would use the cause-and-effect diagram (Figure C.2) to identify all
the program elements that should be in place to prevent worker exposure. This tool can be used
in two ways by the assessor: (1) to verify the effectiveness of individual elements, thereby
verifying that the program is working and (2) to pinpoint the source of programmatic
weaknesses.
C.5 Tree Diagrams
Tree diagrams (Figure C.3) are used to map out, systematically and in increasing detail, the full
range of controls and tasks needed to achieve a primary goal. They can also be used to map out
the barriers needed to prevent unwanted events (called “causal analysis” or “barrier analysis”
trees). Tree diagrams may be used by the assessor to verify whether all planned activities are in
place to support a program’s objective. They are especially useful for helping the assessor gain a
big-picture view of the overall goals of the program, with its supporting sub-goals.
Section 25
In Figure C.3, the tree diagram provides a map of the elements needed to support an effective
training and qualification program. Using the diagram, the assessor can plan the assessment to
Figure C.2
DOE G 414.1-1B C-5
9-27-07
ensure that the appropriate activities are being performed and to evaluate the training
organization’s overall effectiveness. As this tree diagram is used for the assessment, the
elements should be continually rolled up. This means the “Capability/Proficiency Verified”
element should be assessed to determine its impact on “Qualification,” which should be assessed
to ensure it supports overall “Training and Qualification.”
C.6 Information Systems
Information systems comprise a wide range of different forms and formats. In their simplest
form they may include the weekly and monthly laboratory or organizational performance reports
that may be used to alert the organization to potential assessment areas. In more complex form,
these systems may include computerized databases that link performance to specific performance
objectives or track actions to resolve programmatic weaknesses. In either case, information
systems are important tools for assessors, providing much of the necessary data to focus
assessment activities.
In Figure C.4, information on lost-time injuries is displayed in both tabular and graphical form.
This information can be used to focus the assessment on either the location of the injuries or the
work procedures involved, to identify any weaknesses in the accident prevention program.
Figure C.3
C-6 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Figure C.4
DOE G 414.1-1B D-1
9-27-07
APPENDIX D—MANAGEMENT AND INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PLANNING,
PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING
Various scheduling and planning approaches can be used to satisfy the assessment requirements
for integration, grading, and use of a risk-based approach. The following steps present one
approach to planning for management and independent assessments and describe the information
that should be compiled and maintained to manage the process to ensure that its objectives are
achieved.
D.1 Identifying Assessment Areas
Management assessments are performed to comply with the QA Rule and QA Order and to
improve performance. In general, the purpose of this type of assessment is to identify the
management systems, processes, and programs that affect performance and to make
improvements. Management assessments look at the total picture:
• how well the management systems and processes meet the customer’s requirements;
• compliance with standards and requirements;
• meeting the expectations for safely performing work;
• clarity of the organizational mission, goals, and objectives; and
• identifying and correcting problems that hinder the organization from achieving its
objectives.
The emphasis of management assessment is on issues that affect performance, strategic planning,
personnel qualification and training, staffing and skills mix, communication, cost control,
organizational interfaces, and mission objectives.
Independent assessments are also performed to comply with the QA Rule and QA Order and
may be in the form of an audit, surveillance, or inspection conducted by individuals within the
organization or company but independent from the work or process being evaluated or by
individuals from an external organization or company. In general, the purpose of this type of
assessment is to perform the following:
• evaluate compliance with standards and requirements,
Section 26
• evaluate the performance of work,
• measure the quality of the item or service,
• examine process effectiveness, adequacy, and
• promote improvement.
D-2 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
Independent assessments evaluate the performance of work processes with regard to
requirements, compliance, and expectations for safely performing the work and achieving the
goals of the organization. The focus of independent assessments should be the items and
services produced and their associated processes.
Independent assessments are typically performed less frequently than management
assessments but go into greater depth.
D.2 Prioritizing Assessment Activities
Assessments areas should be made based on risk and ranked based on the consequences and
likelihood of occurrence. Those with high risk or multiple lower risks should be ranked
higher. This may result in identifying risks that crosscut several programs, activities, or
organizations, thus benefiting more than one organization.
D.3 Evaluating Probability and Consequences (Risk)
Assessment areas should be evaluated to identify the various factors and elements that could
result in a failure to achieve the mission objectives. Factors to consider include, but are not
limited to the following:
• worker health and safety (injuries, exposures, deaths);
• public health and safety (injuries, exposures, deaths);
• community concerns;
• regulatory and DOE Order noncompliance and liability requirements;
• business efficiency/productivity;
• complexity of the involved processes;
• reliability of the engineering and administrative controls;
• personnel skills and experience;
• maturity of the program, system, or process (developed, mature techniques/processes
versus state-of-the-art or developmental/pilot technology);
• changes that may affect performance (including regulatory);
• life-cycle phase (new, midlife, closeout of activity);
• organizational experience with the program, system, or activity;
• economic uncertainty;
DOE G 414.1-1B D-3
9-27-07
• schedule/commitment or milestones failure; and
• performance measures/indicators, trending downward.
Each of the factors should be evaluated for likelihood of occurrence and severity of
consequences. This is a rough estimate, using professional judgment, and the use of a
multi-disciplined team for this process is encouraged.
D.4 Developing the Assessment Schedule and Plan
The proposed management or independent assessment plan should be reviewed and approved
by the senior line management to whom the assessed organizations are accountable. This
will help ensure that the organizations to be assessed are prepared for the planned
assessments. The schedule and plan should reflect the areas of greatest risk and the
reasonable allocation of resources. Assessment areas that fall “below the line” should be
retained as “targets of opportunity” to be performed if resources become available or if one
of the planned assessments changes in risk or schedule. The assessment schedule and plan is
a tool that allows management and customers to understand the basis for the assessments and
justifies the allocated resources.
Assessment plan documentation can vary from the relatively informal memo for small,
simple scoped independent assessments, to a formally reviewed, approved and distributed
assessment plan for complex and extensive management assessments. In all cases, however,
the following elements should be documented:
Section 27
• scope of the assessment (i.e., the program, system, process, organization, and/or activity
to be assessed);
• objectives of the assessment;
• assessment drivers (e.g., the regulatory requirements, contractual agreements,
performance objectives, and/or internal procedures that will be used);
• assessment team members, including the lead, supporting assessors, and technical experts
(if appropriate);
• assessment process and criteria (e.g. CRADs); and
• assessment schedule, with start and end dates (final planning, notification,
kickoff/entrance meetings, preparation, investigation, closeout/exit meeting, and report
issuance).
The management or independent assessment plan should establish the depth, scope, and
breadth of the assessment. It provides a tool for scheduling and information exchange for
both the assessment team and the management of the assessed organizations.
D-4 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
D.5 Allocating Resources
The resources for performing management or independent assessments may be limited and not
allow for performing an assessment in all areas. Likewise, the benefits of performing
assessments on low risk areas are marginal. As a result, a realistic estimate of the resources
available, including their scheduled availability, should be developed. Additional factors such as
the availability of personnel independent of the areas to be assessed, budget constraints,
management or customer requests, and response/follow-up to previous external assessments
should be considered.
D.6 Maintaining the Assessment Schedule and Plan
Assessment plans should be reviewed periodically and modified as new information about the
facility or organization is obtained that changes the estimated risks or reflects changes in
available resources. These reviews can be used to finalize schedules, assessment areas, team
members, etc. Assessment areas that have increased in risk can be moved up in the schedule,
while others can be moved down. Assessment schedules are meant to be living documents that
are adjusted periodically based on the analysis of operational awareness information, and the
results of internal and external assessment activities. In some cases, assessment areas that were
“below the line” should be moved up to reflect changes that have occurred since the original
planning and ranking was performed.
The results of past assessments, which identified areas of good/noteworthy performance, should
be used to reduce the frequency and depth of future assessments. Areas of poor performance
should receive increased attention, especially if there are indications that management has been
unable to correct identified problems. This is because recurring and cumulative deficiencies,
even in a low hazard operation, may indicate systemic problems and may decrease the likelihood
of achieving its mission.
D.7 Management and Independent Assessment Performance
There are several methods that can be used in evaluating areas during a management or
independent assessment. These can be both quantitative and qualitative and typically include:
• written surveys or questionnaires to be filled out by an organization’s “customers,”
• interviews with personnel, either one-on-one or in groups,
• review of documents or records,
• direct observation of work performance or facilities; and
• performance of drills or exercises.
For all methods, review criteria should be established through the use of regulatory and DOE
requirements, management expectations, experience and judgment.
Section 28
DOE G 414.1-1B D-5
9-27-07
D.8 Identifying Areas for Further Evaluation
List the programs, systems, or processes and the areas of risk, and then further evaluate other
factors such as the following:
• time since the last management or independent assessment;
• opportunities to perform the assessment in conjunction with other organizations (internal or
external),
• work schedules (will a lower-ranked program start or complete before a higher-ranked
program or activity);
• other scheduled assessments (e.g., process improvement teams, etc.) that would be expected
to address the same area;
• availability of assessment personnel, including technical personnel to perform the
assessment; and
• certifications, registrations, or other scheduled activities that would be expected to evaluate
the program, system, or process.
D.9 Management and Independent Assessment Reporting
The results of management or independent assessment performance should be documented and
transmitted to appropriate management levels. Similar to assessment plans, formality of
documentation can vary widely from a memo for small simple scope independent assessments to
reviewed, approved, and distributed reports. In general, the following elements should be
addressed:
• executive summary
• assessment scope
• identification of team members
• identification of personnel contacted
• documents reviewed
• work performance observed
• assessment process and criteria (e.g. CRADs)
• results of the assessment including identification of deficiencies and/or strengths
D-6 DOE G 414.1-1B
9-27-07
D.10 Frequency
Given the likelihood of some or all of these factors being present and the wide variety of DOE
activities, it is impossible to define the “right” management or independent assessment frequency
in this Guide. Too few assessments will not keep pace with the changes occurring in the
program, system, or process. Too many assessments will distract the organization from focused
attention on the safe conduct of work and mission accomplishment. Therefore, it is ultimately
the responsibility of management, guided by assessment professionals, to determine the
appropriate mix of assessments (management and independent) to meet customer requirements
and ensure mission success.
DOE G 414.1-1B E-1 (and E-2)
9-27-07
APPENDIX E—ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ANS American Nuclear Society
ANSI American National Standards Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASQ American Society for Quality
ASQC American Society for Quality Control
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CRAD Criteria Review and Approach Document
DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board
ES&H Environment, Safety, and Health
ISMS Integrated Safety Management System
ISO International Organization for Standardization
ISOP Integrated Safety Oversight Plans
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
ORR Operational Readiness Review
QA Quality Assurance
S/RID Standards/Requirements identification document
SIPS Safety Information Programs