DOE P 411.2, Secretarial Policy Statement on Scientific Integrity
Functional areas: Scientific Integrity, Scientific Technical Information
This Secretarial policy statement is intended to enhance our culture by establishing a unified framework for scientific integrity. This policy applies to all DOE Federal employees. This policy will be reviewed annually. Does not cancel/supersede other directives.
Superseded By:
DOE P 411.2A, DOE Scientific Integrity Policy on Jan 04, 2017
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE P 411.2ADOE Scientific Integrity Policy (Jan 04, 2017)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY:
www.directives.doe.gov Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy POLICY
Washington, D.C.
Approved: 6-2-2014
SUBJECT: SECRETARIAL POLICY STATEMENT ON SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
INTRODUCTION
Science and technology are the foundation of all Department of Energy (DOE) activities, so it is
essential that we be committed to developing and maintaining a culture that fosters the highest
levels of scientific integrity. The credibility of the research the Department supports and conducts,
the decisions we make, and the information we disseminate rest upon our collective integrity. As a
result, a culture of integrity must permeate all elements of the Department's organization.
Scientific integrity is not simply expressed in the day-to-day practices of DOE leadership and
employees; it is given force in the Department's policies, directives, and manuals. This Secretarial
policy statement is intended to enhance our culture by establishing a unified framework for
scientific integrity. This policy applies to all DOE Federal employees. This policy will be
reviewed annually.
I. FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY AT THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY
The Department's mission relies on objective, reliable, accurate, and accessible scientific and
technical information. DOE is committed to ensuring a culture of scientific integrity.
a) Political officials will not suppress or alter scientific or technological findings.
b) DOE will select and retain candidates for scientific positions in DOE based on their
scientific and technological knowledge, credentials, experience, and integrity.
c) DOE will ensure that data and research used to support policy decisions are of high
scientific and technical quality and objectivity. Scientific and technical objectivity will
be supported through independent peer review by qualified experts, where feasible and
appropriate, and consistent with law.
d) DOE civil servants are bound by federal restrictions against conflicts of interest. As
with federal civil servants generally, DOE federal employees in covered positions file
financial disclosure reports annually and are provided annual training on conflict of
interest rules and other federal ethics requirements.
e) Whistleblowers will be provided with appropriate protections under law and
Departmental policy.
f) DOE will facilitate the free flow of scientific and technological information, consistent
with standards for treatment of classified, sensitive, private, and proprietary
information. Transparency and accessibility of scientific and technological information
support the continued advancement of a sound science and technology base to help
guide and inform the nation's critical public policy
DOE P 411.2
2 DOE P 411.2
6-2-2014
decisions; advance the national, economic, and energy security of the U.S.; facilitate the
accomplishment of DOE mission objectives; and maximize the public value of such
efforts.
g) Consistent with the Administration's Open Government Initiative, the Department will
use its website and the resources of its Office of Scientific and Technical Information
to help make research findings more widely available to the public.
h) Scientific and technological findings will be communicated by including a clear
explication of underlying assumptions; accurate contextualization of uncertainties; and
a description of the probabilities associated with both optimistic and pessimistic
Section 2
projections, including best-case and worst-case scenarios where appropriate.
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
The Department is committed to communications policies that promote and maximize, to the
extent practicable, openness and transparency with the media and the American people while
ensuring full compliance with limits on disclosure of classified, sensitive, private, and proprietary
information. Consistent with those limits Department policy supports the free flow of unclassified
scientific information, within the scientific community and between scientists and the public.
In accordance with these principles, the Department is committed to ensuring that scientists
employed directly as Federal employees at Department-owned-and-operated laboratories for the
specific purpose of conducting research may speak to the media and the public about scientific
and technological matters based on their official work, with appropriate coordination with their
immediate supervisor and their public affairs office. In no circumstance may public affairs officers
ask or direct Federal scientists to alter scientific findings. Organizational elements shall develop
mechanisms to resolve disputes that arise from decisions to proceed or not to proceed with
proposed interviews or other public information-related activities.
III. USE OF FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES
The Department is committed to ensuring the integrity of its policy on scientific and technical
Federal Advisory Committees (FACs).
1
a) The recruitment process for new DOE FAC members will be as transparent as
practicable.
b) Professional biographical information for appointed committee members will be
available on the FAC’s website, subject to Privacy Act and other statutory/regulatory
considerations.
c) The selection of members to serve on a scientific or technical FAC will be based on
expertise, knowledge, and contribution to the relevant subject area.
1 Peer-review committees convened solely for the purpose of reviewing research proposals to provide input on intra-
or extramural funding decisions are not covered by this recommendation
DOE P 411.2 3 (and 4)
6-2-2014
d) Except when prohibited by law, all Conflict of Interest waivers granted to committee
members will be publicly available.
e) Except when explicitly stated in a prior agreement between an agency and a FAC, all
reports, recommendations, and products produced by FACs will be treated as solely the
finding of such committees rather than of the U.S. Government, and thus are not
subject to intra- or inter agency revision.
IV. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF GOVERNMENT SCIENTISTS AND
ENGINEERS
The Department is committed to promoting and facilitating, as permitted by law, the professional
development of Federal scientists and engineers.
a) Scientists employed directly as Federal employees at Department-owned-and-operated
laboratories for the specific purpose of conducting research are encouraged to publish
research findings in peer-reviewed, professional, or scholarly journals and to present
findings at professional meetings, subject to prior approval by their supervisor; may
become editors or editorial board members of professional or scholarly journals and
may fully participate in professional or scholarly societies, committees, task forces and
other specialized bodies of professional societies; and to accept honors and awards for
their research accomplishments, consistent with applicable Federal ethics statutes and
Section 3
regulations.
b) The Department is committed to ensuring that its program managers remain up to date
in their professional knowledge and development. Program managers are therefore
permitted to participate in scientific meetings, professional and scholarly societies,
committees, task forces, and other specialized bodies of professional societies, subject
to prior written approval by their supervisor and consistent with applicable
statutory/regulatory considerations.
The foregoing language was taken verbatim from the Secretarial Memorandum titled “Secretarial
Policy Statement on Scientific Integrity” approved by Secretary Chu on March 23, 2012. The
Secretarial Memorandum has been codified into the Directives system through this DOE Policy.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
DANIEL B. PONEMAN
Deputy Secretary