DOE P 226.2, Policy for Federal Oversight and Contractor Assurance Systems
Functional areas: Oversight, Contractor Assurance Systems, Federal Oversight
This Policy establishes the Department of Energy’s (DOE) expectations for the implementation of a comprehensive and robust oversight process that enables the Department’s mission to be accomplished effectively, efficiently, safely, and securely by utilizing and leveraging the outcomes and information from effective Contractor Assurance Systems (CAS) to inform the Government’s oversight wherever appropriate.
Supersedes:
DOE P 226.1B, Department of Energy Oversight Policy on Aug 09, 2016
Version history and related documents
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
- DOE P 226.1BDepartment of Energy Oversight Policy (Aug 09, 2016)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
U.S. Department of Energy POLICY
Washington, D.C. DOE P 226.2
Approved: 8-9-2016
SUBJECT: POLICY FOR FEDERAL OVERSIGHT AND CONTRACTOR ASSURANCE
SYSTEMS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Policy establishes the Department of Energy’s (DOE) expectations for the implementation
of a comprehensive and robust oversight process that enables the Department’s mission to be
accomplished effectively, efficiently, safely, and securely by utilizing and leveraging the
outcomes and information from effective Contractor Assurance Systems (CAS) to inform the
Government’s oversight wherever appropriate. This policy supersedes the existing CAS policy
(DOE P 226.1B), expands the scope of CAS beyond the environment, safety, security, and health
areas to include business and financial systems, and emphasizes the importance of establishing
and maintaining productive relationships between contractor, Federal, and corporate parent
personnel. As used in this Policy, any reference to DOE is also meant to include the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).
POLICY
Effective oversight of the DOE contractor complex should be integrated into all operations such
that all personnel, Federal and contractor alike, are responsible and accountable for conducting
their missions to the highest standard. CAS are applied to all operating and business functions
including systems for the protection of the worker, public, environment, property, business, and
financial matters. The principles of trust, accountability, integrity, and respect, along with
frequent and open communication, must be the foundations upon which our mission is
performed. Contractors should responsibly oversee their own work, identify concerns and
reliably report unexpected adverse outcomes to prevent recurrence.
CAS are designed and utilized by contractors to manage performance consistent with contract
requirements. CAS enables the corporate parent, if applicable, to assess performance, provides
data to the contractor’s management decision-making process, and allows the contractor to more
effectively manage processes, resources and outcomes. CAS provide clear communication of the
mission needs and goals and enable DOE to determine the necessary level of Federal oversight.
Under CAS, contractors provide reasonable assurance that their management controls are
effective and efficient. CAS are risk-based systems that focus on outcomes and seek to minimize
performance risk.
CAS are an integral component of a contractor’s management systems and DOE’s Enterprise
Risk Management. The Department integrates its oversight activities with CAS (both at
individual sites and with the larger family of CAS for activities across the complex) to confirm
the adequacy of the contractor’s internal controls and integrated management systems.
AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: CO-INITIATED BY:
www.directives.doe.gov Office of Management (MA) and Office of the Associate Under
Secretary for Environment, Health, Safety and Security (AU)
http://www.directives.doe.gov/
2 DOE P 226.2
8-9-2016
Attributes of effective assurance and oversight processes include the following:
(1) Contractor Assurance Systems
• are tailored to meet the needs and unique risks of each site or activity
• include methods to perform rigorous self-assessments
• conduct feedback and continuous improvement activities
• establish metrics to identify and correct negative performance trends
• include independent reviews
• assure that corrective actions implemented are effective
Section 2
• share lessons learned
(2) DOE oversight programs, including independent oversight, include the following:
• designed and conducted commensurate with the level of risk of the activities
• higher priority and greater emphasis are given to oversight of activities with
potentially high consequences1
DOE line management will assure contract compliance by monitoring planned, ongoing, and
accomplished work and providing timely feedback to the contractor on matters deserving
attention. In parallel, the contractor's assurance systems must be transparent and the contractor
must continue to pursue mission excellence.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
ELIZABETH SHERWOOD-RANDALL
Deputy Secretary
1 These activities include, but are not limited to, Hazard Category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities and activities
to protect strategic quantities of special nuclear material and highly sensitive information assets.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
POLICY
(1)Contractor Assurance Systems
(2)DOE oversight programs, including independent oversight, include the following: