DOE O 542.2A, Unsolicited Proposals
Functional areas: Business and Support Services
The order sets forth Department of Energy (DOE) requirements and responsibilities for the receipt, processing, and review of unsolicited proposals (USPs). To ensure that those submitting USPs are notified in a timely manner of the status (e.g., pending, accepted for funding, or declined) of their Supersedes DOE O 542.2. Certified 12-28-06.
Version history and related documents
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Procurement and Assistance Management
U. S. Department of Energy ORDER
Washington, D.C.
Approved: 2-27-02
Certified: 12-28-06
SUBJECT: UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
1. OBJECTIVES.
a. To set forth Department of Energy (DOE) requirements and responsibilities for
the receipt, processing, and review of unsolicited proposals (USPs).
b. To ensure those submitting USPs are notified in a timely manner of the status
(e.g., pending, accepted for funding, or declined) of their proposals.
2. CANCELLATION. DOE O 542.2, Unsolicited Proposals, dated 10-28-96.
3. APPLICABILITY.
a. DOE Elements. Except for the exclusions in paragraph 3c, the provisions of this
Order apply to all DOE elements, including the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA), receiving USPs for the purpose of obtaining contracts or
financial assistance awards from the Department or in response to Notices of
Program Interest, as defined in the DOE financial assistance rules at Title 10 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) 600.9.
b. Contractors. This Order does not apply to DOE contractors.
c. Exclusions. The provisions of this Order do not apply to the following:
(1) proposals or applications submitted in response to invitations for bids,
requests for proposals, requests for quotations, program opportunity
notices, program research and development announcements, program
rules, program solicitations, or solicitations with a common cutoff date for
submission under which the submissions are evaluated concurrently;
(2) communications titled "proposal" that are clearly advertising material,
commercial product offers, contributions, technical correspondence, or
suggestions; or
(3) USPs submitted to the Power Marketing Administrations or the Office of
Naval Reactors.
4. REQUIREMENTS.
a. Nondisclosure of Information. Except as provided in the nondisclosure certificate
contained in Appendix B of Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance and
DOE O 542.2A
2 DOE O 542.2A
2-27-02
Unsolicited Proposals (hereafter referred to as DOE Merit Review Guide), DOE
personnel must not disclose restricted information included in any USP to
individuals who are not participating in the same evaluation proceedings. The
disclosure of such information concerning trade secrets, processes, operations,
styles of work, apparatuses, and other matters, except as authorized, may result in
criminal penalties under Title 18 United States Code, section 1905.
b. Presubmission Discussions.
(1) Presubmission discussions with prospective submitters must be limited
to discussions of the DOE mission and needs relative to the type of
effort contemplated by the submitter. The purpose of any such
presubmission discussions is to establish that the contemplated
submission has the potential to meet the Department's mission and
program needs, reduce paperwork, and save considerable time and effort
for the submitter and the Department. The Department will, however,
make available to prospective submitters, information in accordance
with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.604.
(2) Advance discussions with a potential submitter must not encourage or
otherwise authorize the submitter to perform any work at DOE expense in
anticipation of award.
c. Unsolicited Proposal Processing and Control.
(1) Except for classified USPs, all USPs must be sent to the Department's
USP manager at the following address:
Section 2
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Pittsburgh Office
626 Cochrans Mill Road
P.O. Box 10940
Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940.
Individuals requesting information regarding the process for sending
classified USPs should be directed to contact the program office that
would be responsible for reviewing the USP to obtain instructions on
shipping the classified USP. The program office should provide the
method for transmitting the classified USP, including the classified mail
address, how to prepare the package for shipping, etc. Unclassified
summaries of the USP should be provided to the USP manager as detailed
in paragraph 4(c)(3). DOE M 471.2-1C, Classified Matter Protection and
Control Manual, dated 4-17-01, contains the current Departmental policy
for shipping and handling of classified information.
(2) The USP manager must take the following actions upon receipt of USP
submissions.
DOE O 542.2A 3
2-27-02
(a) Review USPs within 10 business days of receipt to ensure they
comply with FAR parts 15.605 and 15.609(a) through 15.609(d).
(b) Acknowledge receipt of USPs.
1 Acknowledge receipt to outside submitters and request
information required under FAR 15.605 for evaluation, if
applicable.
2 Send letters of acknowledgment to Members of Congress
who forward USPs to DOE. Letters to Members of
Congress must be sent to the Executive Secretariat in
accordance with current procedures.
(c) Enter information pertaining to USPs and submitters into the DOE
USP Database Tracking System within 10 business days of receipt,
and obtain tracking numbers (from the system) for the USPs.
(d) Assign and forward USPs to the appropriate USP program liaison
officers for preliminary review.
(3) All DOE departments, including the Office of Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation, NNSA, must upon receipt of a classified USP (e.g.,
SECRET) submit the following to the USP manager:
(a) a written report of receipt,
(b) an unclassified summary of the proposal, and
(c) a statement of disposition.
(4) Program offices must maintain adequate records, in accordance with
DOE O 200.1, Information Management Program, to respond to
subsequent inquiries regarding the basis for the decision to support or not
support a USP.
(5) The USP manager must prepare a monthly field validation report using the
DOE USP Database Tracking System and provide it to each USP program
liaison officer assigned a USP. Program offices must review these reports
to ensure they accurately reflect the status of proposals and promptly
notify the USP manager of any updates or issues regarding status.
d. Unsolicited Proposal Preliminary Review. USP program liaison officers must
ensure that program reviewing officials determine USPs comply with the
requirements specified in FAR parts 15.606-1, 15.609(f)(3), 15.609(g), and
15.609(h)(2) and all subsequent reviews comply with the applicable rules and
regulations.
4 DOE O 542.2A
2-27-02
(1) USP program liaison officers must forward USPs to reviewers within the
program office (program reviewing officials) for preliminary review to
determine whether further consideration is warranted.
(2) USP program liaison officers must also notify the USP manager by
electronic mail, within 10 business days of receipt of a USP, of the
identity of the program reviewing official assigned the proposal.
(3) Preliminary reviews should include an assessment of whether there are
any impediments to a noncompetitive award, such as the following:
Section 3
(a) lack of programmatic interest or failure to contribute to the
agency's or activity's mission [FAR, parts 15.606-2(a)(3) and
15.607(a)(3)];
(b) failure to demonstrate a unique, innovative, or meritorious idea,
method, or approach [FAR, parts 15.606-2(a)(1) and 15.607(a)(4)
and 10 CFR 600.6(c)(7)];
(c) lack of funds for support [FAR, part 15.607(b)(3)];
(d) availability to the Government without restriction from another
source [FAR, part 15.607(a)(1)]; and
(e) close resemblance to a recent, current, or planned solicitation or
program opportunity notice [FAR, part 15.607(a)(2)].
(4) USP program liaison officers must notify the USP manager of the results
of preliminary reviews within 20 business days after receipt of proposals
by program reviewing officials. If the results of a preliminary review
indicate a proposal should be rejected, a declination letter describing the
basis of rejection will be prepared by the responsible program reviewing
official or his/her designee and sent to the submitter with a copy to the
USP manager.
e. Unsolicited Proposal Evaluation.
(1) If a USP is not rejected as a result of the preliminary review, the USP
program liaison officer must ensure that individuals knowledgeable in the
field of endeavor conduct a comprehensive assessment of the technical
and scientific merits of the USP in accordance with the DOE Merit
Review Guide or the specific program's internal merit review procedures,
if they are consistent with the DOE Merit Review Guide. Merit reviewers
should use a formal rating system and forms such as the Rating Plan and
the Review Form for Noncompetitive Applications and Unsolicited
Proposals contained in Appendix C of the DOE Merit Review Guide. The
program official responsible for the review should follow the guidance in
DOE O 542.2A 5
2-27-02
the Rating Plan and DOE Merit Review Guide and prepare a summary
statement for the proposal.
(2) If a USP is determined to have sufficient technical or scientific merit, the
USP program liaison officer must ensure that the official responsible for
the review conducts a technical evaluation of the proposal to determine
cost realism.
f. Unsolicited Proposal Acceptance. If as a result of merit and other reviews the
program office recommends accepting a proposal, the following actions must be
completed.
(1) The USP program liaison officer must ensure that the program reviewing
official prepares a justification for a noncompetitive award in accordance
with 10 CFR 600.6(c)(7) for financial assistance or FAR 6.3 for
acquisition. The justification should include the results of the merit
review evaluation.
(2) Noncompetitive determinations for financial assistance awards must be
approved by the individuals identified in 10 CFR 600.6(d).
Noncompetitive determinations for acquisitions must be approved by the
individuals identified in FAR 6.304, using the related thresholds.
(3) The USP program liaison should prepare a Procurement
Request-Authorization (DOE F 4200.33) and forward the request,
proposal, justification for noncompetitive award, merit review summary
statement, and technical review of cost to the appropriate contracting
activity for negotiation of an award.
(4) The USP program liaison must also forward a copy of the approved
Procurement Request-Authorization (USP number annotated); the
procurement office information (i.e., contact name, location, and
telephone number); and a copy of the determination or justification for
noncompetitive award to the USP manager.
Section 4
g. Unsolicited Proposal Rejection. If the program office rejects a proposal, the USP
program liaison officer must ensure that the following actions are completed.
(1) Obtain a declination letter setting forth the rationale for rejection from the
program reviewing official and mail it to the submitter.
(2) Submit a copy of the signed declination letter to the USP manager within
5 business days of the date of the letter.
(3) Promptly return all copies of the proposal when the proposal resembles, in
substance, that of a current or planned competitive solicitation or program
opportunity notice. The submitter will be advised of the following:
6 DOE O 542.2A
2-27-02
(a) the current or planned solicitation or notice and access information,
(b) how to access any program's business alert registration, if
applicable, and
(c) that a proposal or application may be submitted in accordance with
the requirements of the competitive solicitation or notice.
h. The USP manager enters each disposition decision into the DOE USP Database
Tracking System.
i. If a proposal has undergone a comprehensive merit review, a final decision must
be reached by the responsible program reviewing official within 90 days after the
proposal's receipt by the USP program liaison officer. If a final decision has not
been made by that time, a 90-day delinquent report, specifying the status of the
review and an expected final decision date, will be forwarded to the USP manager
by the USP program liaison officer.
j. No negotiations should be held with the submitter until a proposal is accepted.
Discussions, if necessary, may occur to clarify the proposal and costs proposed.
Clarification that occurred during the proposal review will be documented and
forwarded to the contracting officer should the proposal be accepted for award.
The contracting officer in the cognizant procurement office is responsible for
directing negotiations to begin at the appropriate time.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES.
a. Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management through the Office
of Management Systems and Services. Has overall management responsibility
for the USP Program, including providing Departmental policy on USP
procedures, submission, evaluation, and disposition.
b. Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory through the Director,
Acquisition and Assistance Division. Has operational responsibility for the USP
Program, including the following:
(1) managing the USP Database Tracking System and monitoring its
compliance with this Order;
(2) receiving, acknowledging, assigning, and monitoring the progress of USPs
forwarded to DOE for evaluation;
(3) providing training or other assistance to Departmental elements upon
request;
(4) serving as the Department's point of contact on USPs; and
DOE O 542.2A 7
2-27-02
(5) providing monthly, quarterly, year-end and ad hoc reports to affected
Departmental elements.
c. Unsolicited Proposal Manager.
(1) Maintains centralized control of program office review, tracking, and
reporting of USPs.
(2) Maintains lists of−
(a) all contact points (including USP program liaison officers) and
(b) program office representatives empowered to speak for
programmatic interests.
d. Heads of Departmental Elements. Must appoint an individual within their
department to serve as USP program liaison officer.
e. Unsolicited Proposal Liaison Officers.
(1) Ensure timely and accurate reporting to USP manager on status of
proposal evaluations.
Section 5
(2) Provide for the adequate and proper maintenance of records.
(3) Develop detailed procedures for timely and fair handling and review of
USPs within their specific organizations.
(4) Ensure timely disposition of USPs.
6. REFERENCES. The following references are available on the Internet at
http://www.pr.doe.gov/fahome.html.
a. FAR, subpart 15.6, covers USPs.
b. Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR), subpart 915.6, covers
USPs.
c. Title 10 CFR, part 600, "Department of Energy (DOE) Financial Assistance
Rules," section 600.6 (c), covers Noncompetitive financial assistance and section
100.10 (b) covers forms.
d. DOE O 542.1, Competition in Contracting, dated 6-30-97, establishes policies
and procedures to ensure that Departmental competitive contract procedures
conform to the requirements of the Competition in Contracting Act.
8 DOE O 542.2A
2-27-02
e. Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance and Unsolicited Proposals,
Department of Energy, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Management, dated December 1999.
7. CONTACT. Questions concerning this Order should be referred to the National
Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Business and Logistics, Acquisition and
Assistance Division, at 412-386-4524.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
FRANCIS S. BLAKE
Deputy Secretary