DOE O 5000.4A, Laboratory Directed Research and Development
Functional areas: Program Planning and Management
Cancels DOE O 5000.4.
Canceled by DOE O 413.2 of 3-05-1997.
Superseded By:
DOE O 413.2, Laboratory Directed Research and Development on Mar 05, 1997
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE O 413.2Laboratory Directed Research and Development (Mar 05, 1997)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
THIS PAGE MUST BE KEPT WITH DOE 5000.4A, LABORATORY DIRECTED
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
DOE 5000.4A, LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT HAS REVISED DOE 5000.4 TO REFLECT
ORGANIZATIONAL TITLE AND ROUTING SYMBOL EDITORIAL
CHANGES REQUIRED BY SEN-6D-91. NO SUBSTANTIVE
CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF
PAGES AFFECTED BY THE REVISIONS, THE ORDER HAS
BEEN ISSUED AS A REVISION.
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, D.C.
ORDER
DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
SUBJECT: LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
1. PURPOSE. To establish the Department’s policy and guidelines regarding
Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at its multiprogram
laboratories.
2. CANCELLATION. DOE 5000.4, LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,
of 2-28-91.
3. SCOPE. The provisions of this Order apply to all Departmental Elements
which direct, monitor, or utilize the Department’s multiprogram labora-
tories and to the contractors operating these laboratories for the
Department, as provided by law and/or contract, and as implemented by
the appropriate contracting officer.
4. BACKGROUND. Independent and internal reviews of the DOE multiprogram
laboratory system have consistently recommended that the laboratory
directors be allowed flexibility to select and conduct a limited number
of research and development projects to exploit creative and innovative
concepts. Such discretionary research and development is critical in
maintaining the scientific excellence and vitality of the laboratories.
Reviews have suggested that each laboratory should have a formal
internal peer and/or scientific management review and selection process
based on uniform Departmental criteria and guidelines which emphasize
scientific and technological merit, and subject to adequate DOE
oversight to ensure all funds are used appropriately.
5. REFERENCES.
a.
b.
c.
d.
DOE 5000.1B, INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING BY MULTIPROGRAM LABORATORIES, of
4-9-92, which establishes the policies and responsibilities for the
Department’s principal oversight process for its multiprogram
laboratories.
DOE 5000.2B, MULTIPROGRAM LABORATORY APPRAISALS, of 4-9-92, which
establishes the policies and responsibilities for appraising the
performance of the Department’s multiprogram laboratories.
The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Title 42 United States
Code (U.S.C.) 2013, 2051, and 2053, which provides broad authority
for research and development activities and their funding.
The Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law
193-438, 42 U.S.C. 5801 (b), 5813 and 5817 (a), which created the
Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) to bring
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Energy Research
2 DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
e.
f.
together and di
development on
rect Federal activities relating to research and
the various sources of energy and to carry out
general basic research activities.
The Department of Energy Organization Act, as amended, Public Law
95-91, 42 U.S.C, 7111 (4), 7112 (5), which places the research and
development activities formerly performed by the Atomic Energy
Commission and ERDA under the Secretary of Energy, and directs the
Department to carry out the planning, support and management of a
comprehensive energy research and development program.
Section 2
An Act to authorize appropriations to the Energy Research and
Development Administration for Fiscal Year 1977; Public Law 95-39,
which provides specific authority so that the Director of a
Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory may use a reason-
able amount of the laboratory’s operating budget to fund
employee-suggested projects up to the pilot stage of development,
with the approval of the Secretary.
6. DEFINITIONS.
a. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) is research and
development work of a creative and innovative nature which is
selected by the laboratory director, or his or her designee, for the
purpose of maintaining the scientific and technological vitality of
the laboratory and to respond to scientific and technological oppor-
tunities in conformance with the guidelines in this Order. This
LDRD includes activities previously defined as ER&D as well as other
discretionary research and development activities not provided for
in a DOE program.
b. Cognizant Secretarial Officer is a Secretarial Officer responsible
for management oversight of a multiprogram laboratory as delineated
in DOE 5000.1B. -
c. Laboratory Appraisal is an annual evaluation of multiprogram
laboratory management performance conducted in accordance with
5000.2B.
7. POLICY.
a. It is the policy of the Department to permit each multiprogram
laboratory to carry out a limited amount of basic and applied
DOE
research and development which focuses on early exploration and
exploitation of creative and innovative concepts selected at the
discretion of the laboratory director. The purpose of this policy
is to enhance the ability of the laboratories to address the future
mission objectives of the Department. This is accomplished by
providing the laboratories with the flexibility to support new
science and technology ideas to determine their worth and a
DOE 5000.4A 3
4-9-92
mechanism which is a major factor in achieving and maintaining staff
excellence. The LDRD program provides the multiprogram laboratories
with an opportunity to fund new and highly innovative research
activities.
b. The level of allowable funding which may be expended by each
laboratory will be established annually in accordance with the
requirements of this Order. However, the level so established shall
not exceed an amount of operating funds equivalent to 6 percent of
its total operating budget, including non-DOE funded work, for the
year, plus an amount of capital equipment funds not to exceed 6
percent of its total capital equipment budget for the year. The
system for accrual of these funds shall, to the extent reasonable,
provide for equitable pro rata contributions by all sources of
operating and capital equipment funding.
c. The annual level of LDRD funding will be based not only on how well
the laboratory manages the LDRD program, but also on overall
laboratory management performance.
d. The Department will exercise effective oversight of the
laboratories’ LDRD program and integrate review of
the Institutional Planning Process.
8. RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES.
a.
b.
c.
The Secretary.
(1) Establishes the Department’s policy on LDRD.
(2) Approves the laboratories’ LDRD Plans and the
the program with
allowable funding
levels recommended by the Cognizant Secretarial Officers.
Section 3
Director of EnergyResearch ensures that the LDRD program is
integrated with the Institutional Planning Process which includes
the multiprogram laboratory appraisal process. The Director carries
out for the Office of the Secretary, or by request of the Cognizant
Secretarial officer, periodic review of the LDRD policy and its
implementation (in cooperation with appropriate Departmental
Elements) and recommends revisions, as required.
Cognizant Secretarial Officers.
(1) Exercise general oversight of all activities related to LDRD at
the laboratories for which they have cognizance.
(2) To ensure adequate compliance with the requirements of this
Order, annually conduct a review, with the assistance of the
appropriate DOE Field Office Manager, of each laboratory’s LDRD
4 DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
activities, including each laboratory’s LORD management system,
as well as the results of the program.
(3) Establish such additional procedures and/or guidelines as are
required to fully and efficiently implement the requirements of
this Order. These may be tailored to their Headquarters
organizations, to the pertinent DOE Field Offices, and to the
laboratories for which they have cognizance.
(4) Annually establish for each laboratory, a level of resources
which may be expended on LORD for the next fiscal year. The
determination of this level will be based in part on a plan
proposed and submitted by the laboratory director through the
cognizant DOE Field Office Manager, and in part on the results
of the most recent review of the laboratory’s LDRD program.
The plan shall provide a general description and justification
of the LORD program, and explain how this program will meet
laboratory needs, support the laboratory’s mission, and benefit
the Department and the Nation. Additionally, on the premise
that the effectiveness of the LORD program is forecast by the
overall effectiveness of the laboratory’s management, the
determination will also be based on the most recent laboratory
annual appraisal.
(5) Provide the laboratories’ LDRD plans and the recommended
maximum allowable funding levels and rationale to the Secretary
for approval.
d. Managers of DOE Field Offices.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Provide an evaluation of the laboratory’s LORD activities and
processes to the Cognizant Secretarial Officer and any other
information, as necessary, to assist the Cognizant Secretarial
Officer in the annual review of each laboratory’s LORD program.
Annually review and certify in writing to the Cognizant
Secretarial Officer that the laboratory’s method for
accumulating LORD funds meets the requirements of this Order.
Conduct such additional reviews of each laboratory’s LDRD
activities as are necessary to ensure that each laboratory is
complying with the requirements of this Order as well as the
requirements of the laboratory’s LORD management system.
9. LDRD GUIDELINES.
a. Selection of Projects. Each laboratory will establish a defined
process, utilizing internal peer and/or scientific management
review, with selection criteria which emphasize scientific and
technological excellence. A significant portion of the projects
DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
5
b.
c.
d.
e.
selected should be those independently proposed by individual
researchers or small multidisciplinary teams. As noted in paragraph
8d above, the DOE Field Office Manager will provide an evaluation of
the laboratory’s LDRD processes for review by the Cognizant
Secretarial Officer.
General characteristics of LDRD Projects.
Section 4
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Projects, normally relatively small, in the forefront areas of
basic and applied science and technology for the primary
purpose of enriching laboratory capabilities.
Advanced study of new hypotheses, new concepts, or innovative
approaches to scientific or technical problems.
Experiments and analyses directed towards “proof of principle”
or early determination of the utility of new scientific ideas.
Conception and preliminary technical analysis of experimental
facilities or devices.
Length of Projects. LDRD projects normally will be limited to a
maximum period of funding of 3 years. Exceptions may be granted by
the Cognizant Secretarial Officer, but such extensions will be
treated de novo (i.e., any project in for extension beyond 3 years
must be reviewed as if it were a new project).
Appropriate LDRD Expenditures. LDRD expenditures shall be
considered an allowable cost in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the laboratory operating contract, and shall be
identified in the laboratory accounting system. With the exception
of the restrictions listed in paragraph 9e below, funding of LDRD
projects may include all costs normally associated with similar
research and development activities of the laboratory such as travel
in direct support of a project, capital equipment in direct support
of a project, or support for participation by non-laboratory
personnel.
Restrictions, LDRD funds may not be used to:
(1) Substitute for or increase funding for any tasks for which a
specific limitation has been established by Congress or the
Department, or for any specific tasks that are funded by DOE or
other users of the laboratory.
(2) Fund LDRD projects that will require the addition of non-LDRD
funds in order to reach a useful stage of completion.
6 DOE 5000.4A
4-9-92
(3) Fund construction design beyond the preliminary phase (e. q.
conceptual design, Title I design work, or any
advanced design effort may not be supported).
(4) Fund construction line-item projects, in whole
(5) Fund capital expenditures of a general purpose
similar or more
or in part.
nature with the
exception of acquisition of general purpose equipment which is
clearly required for the project and is not otherwise readily
available from the laboratory inventory.
f. Reporting Requirement. Each laboratory shall submit an annual
written report on its LDRD activities to the Cognizant Secretarial
Officer through the appropriate DOE Field Office Manager. The
annual report shall include a technical and financial overview of
the program, as well as a short summary of each funded project.
Additionally, each laboratory will provide reports to the Office of
Scientific and Technical Information.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
JOHN J. NETTLES, JR.
Director of Administration
and Human Resource Management