DOE O 425.1 Chg 1, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities
Functional areas: Requires Crosswalk When Revised, Work Processes
To establish the requirements for the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), for start up of new nuclear facilities and for the restart of existing nuclear facilities that have been shut down. Cancels DOE 5480.31.
Canceled by DOE O 425.1A.
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE O 425.1AStartup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities (Dec 28, 1998)
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
- DOE O 425.1Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities (Oct 26, 1995)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, D.C.
ORDER
DOE O 425.1
Approved: 09-29-95
Review Date: 09-29-97
SUBJECT: STARTUP AND RESTART OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES Chg 1: 1O-26-95
1. OBJECTIVE.
facilities
shutdown.
all cases,
facility.
documented
To establish the requirements for startup of new nuclear
and for the restart of existing nuclear facilities that have been
The requirements specify a readiness review process that shall, in
demonstrate that it is safe to startup (or restart) the applicable
The facility shall be started up (or restarted), only after
independent reviews of readiness have been conducted and the
approvals specified in this Order have been received. The readiness reviews
are not intended to be tools of line management to confirm readiness. Rather,
the readiness reviews provide an independent review of readiness to start or
restart operations.
2. CANCELLATION. DOE 5480.31, STARTUP AND RESTART OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, of
9-15-93. Cancellation of an Order does not, by itself, modify or otherwise
affect any contractual obligation to comply with such an Order. Canceled
Orders incorporated by reference in a contract shall remain in effect until
the contract is modified to delete the reference to the requirements in the
canceled Orders.
3. APPLICABILITY.
a. DOE Elements. Except for the exclusions in paragraph 3c, below, this
Order applies to all nuclear facilities classified as hazard categories
1, 2, or 3.
b. Contractors. Except for the exclusions in paragraph 3c, below, the
Contractor Requirements Document (CRD), Attachment 1, sets forth
requirements that are to be applied to the universe of contractors
awarded contracts for the operation and management of a DOE-owned or
-leased facility. Contractor compliance with the CRD will be required
to the extent set forth in a contract. Contractors shall be directed to
continue to comply with the requirements of Orders canceled by this
Order until their contracts are modified to delete the reference to the
requirements of the canceled Orders.
c. Exclusions.
(1) Activities regulated through a license by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) or a State under an Agreement with NRC, including
activities certified by the NRC under section 1701 of the Atomic
Energy Act.
(2) Activities conducted under the authority of the Director, Naval
Nuclear Propulsion Program as described in Public Law 98-525.
Vertical line denotes change.
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Environment, Safety
and Health
2
(3)
(4)
(5)
DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
Activities conducted under Nuclear Explosives and Weapons
Safety Programs relating to the prevention of accidental or
authorized nuclear detonations to the extent a requirement
under this Order cannot be implemented for a particular
facility in a manner that does not compromise the
effectiveness of such activities.
Activities regulated by the Department of Transportation or
pursuant to 49 CFR 173.7(b)
DOE nuclear facilities that are classified as below hazard
category 3.
4. REQUIREMENTS. DOE-STD-3006-95 provides guidance on approaches and
methods approved as acceptable for implementing the requirements of this
Order. Other approaches and methods may be used provided they are
justified, documented, and approved as being in accordance with the
requirements of this Order by the authorization authority for startup or
restart.
a. General.
Section 2
(1) Operational Readiness Review. DOE line management shall
determine (and ensure that contractor management determines)
if Operational Readiness Reviews are required for startup of
new nuclear facilities or restart of a nuclear facility
using the requirements given below. DOE shall conduct (and
ensure that contractors conduct) an Operational Readiness
Review in accordance with this Order when any of the
following conditions occur:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Initial startups of new hazard categories 1, 2, and 3
nuclear facilities.
Restart after a nuclear facility unplanned shutdown
directed by a DOE management official for safety or
other appropriate reasons.
Restart after an extended shutdown for hazard
categories 1 and 2 nuclear facilities. Extended
shutdown for a hazard category 1 nuclear facility is 6
months. Extended shutdown for a hazard category 2
nuclear facility is 2 months.
Restart of hazard categories 1 and 2 nuclear
facilities after substantial process, system, or
facility modifications that require changes in the
safety basis previously approved by DOE.
Restart after a nuclear facility shutdown because! of
operations outside the safety basis.
DOE O 425.1 3
9-29-95
(f) When deemed appropriate by DOE management officials,
including restarts of hazard category 3 nuclear
facilities.
(2) Readiness Assessment. For restarts of nuclear facilities
not requiring an Operational Readiness Review, as defined in
this Order, DOE line management shall evaluate (and ensure
that contractor management evaluates) the need for
performing a Readiness Assessment prior to restart. This
includes the startup or restart of program work within
operating facilities when the new or restarted program work
does not require DOE approval of changes to facility limits
or requirements as stated in Operational Safety
Requirements/Technical Safety Requirements (OSRs/TSRs),
Basis for Interim Operations/Safety Analysis Reports
(BIO/SARs), or other equivalent authorization basis
documents. When a Readiness Assessment is required,
Operations Offices shall develop procedures and ensure that
the contractors use these procedures to gain Operations
Office approval of the startup or restart of nuclear
facilities. If a Readiness Assessment is not to be
performed, the contractor s standard procedures for startup
or restart will be used. Other requirements for Readiness
Assessments are provided in paragraph 4c, below.
(3) Authorization Authority. For nuclear facility startup or
restart actions, the authorization authority for startup or
restart approval shall be determined by the following.
(a) For initial startups of new hazard categories 1 and 2
nuclear facilities, the Secretary of Energy (or
designee) shall approve startup. For initial startups
of new hazard category 3 nuclear facilities, the
Secretarial Officer (or designee) shall approve
startup. If other DOE Orders require a higher level
of startup authorization than this Order, the official
described in this Order will recommend startup to the
higher level official.
(b) For shutdowns directed by a DOE management official
for safety or other appropriate reasons, authorization
to restart shall be granted by an official of a level
commensurate with the official ordering the shutdown
unless a higher level is designated by the Secretarial
Officer.
(c) For extended shutdowns of hazard category 1 nuclear
facilities, the Secretarial Officer shall approve
restart. For extended shutdowns of hazard category 2
nuclear facilities, the Secretarial Officer (or
designee) shall approve restart.
Section 3
4 DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
(d) For shutdowns because of substantial plant or facility
modifications of hazard category 1 nuclear facilities
that require changes in the safety basis previously
approved by DOE, the Secretarial Officer shall approve
restart. For such shutdowns of hazard category 2
nuclear facilities, the Secretarial Officer (or
designee) shall approve restart.
(e) For facility shutdowns due to operations outside the
safety basis, the official approving restart shall be
commensurate with the approval authority for the
safety basis. If the safety basis was approved by a
Headquarters official, the Secretarial Officer (or
designee) shall approve restart. If the safety basis
was approved by a field official, the Operations
Office Manager (or designee) shall approve restart.
(f) For startups or restarts of nuclear facilities for
which Operational Readiness Reviews were required as a
result of a DOE official deeming it appropriate, the
official approving startup or restart shall be of a
level commensurate with the official directing the
review. If a Headquarters official directed an
Operational Readiness Review be performed, the
Secretarial Officer (or designee) shall approve the
startup or restart. If a field official directed an
Operational Readiness Review, the Operations Office
Manager (or designee) shall approve the startup or
restart.
b. Requirements Applicable to Startups or Restarts of Nuclear
Facilities Involving Operational Readiness Reviews. (These
requirements are listed sequentially.)
(1) Operational Readiness Review Documentation. For Operational
Readiness Reviews, DOE line management shall require
contractors to prepare the following documents:
startup/restart notification reports, plans-of-action,
Operational Readiness Reviews Implementation Plans, and
final reports. DOE line management shall prepare its plans-
of-action, Operational Readiness Review Implementation
Plans, and final reports. The resolution of all findings
from the Operational Readiness Reviews shall be documented
and maintained with the plans-of-action, Implementation
Plans, and final reports.
(2) Breadth of Operational Readiness Review. DOE line
management shall develop (and ensure the contractor
develops) the breadth of the Operational Readiness Review
and documents it in each plan-of-action. A minimum set of
core requirements, as defined in paragraph 4d, below, shall
DOE O 425.1 5
9-29-95
be addressed when developing the breadth of the Operational
Readiness Review. The plan-of-action may reference a
timely, independent review that addressed the requirement in
a technically satisfactory manner to justify not performing
further evaluation of a core requirement, or portion
thereof. During conduct of the Operational Readiness
Review, the breadth may be expanded by the Operational
Readiness Review team, if appropriate.
(3) Operational Readiness Review Plans-of-Action, Approval, and
Content. The contractor and DOE Operational Readiness
Review plans-of-action shall be approved by the startup or
restart authorities defined in paragraphs 4a(3)(a) through
4a(3)(f). DOE line management shall ensure the contractor s
plan-of-action specifies the prerequisites for starting the
responsible contractor s Operational Readiness Review; the
prerequisites shall address each core requirement of section
determined to be applicable when developing the scope of the
Operational Readiness Review. The DOE plan-of-action shall
specify additional prerequisites, such as certification of
readiness to oversee facility operations by Operations
Office and Headquarters management. The DOE and contractor
plans-of-action shall be provided to EH for review and
comment.
Section 4
(4) Operational Readiness Review Teams.
(a) DOE line management shall appoint (and ensure that
contractor management appoints) Operational Readiness
Review teams in accordance with the following
qualifications and training requirements:
1 Technical knowledge of the area assigned for
evaluation, including experience working in the
technical area.
2 Knowledge of performance-based assessment
processes and methods.
3 Knowledge of facility-specific information.
(b) The Operational Readiness Review teams shall not
include as senior members (including team leader)
individuals from offices assigned direct line
management responsibility for the work being reviewed;
any exceptions require approval of the startup or
restart authority. Additionally, no Operational
Readiness Review team member should review work for
which he or she is directly responsible.
6 DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
(c) The Operational Readiness Review team leaders shall
determine and document qualifications of Operational
Readiness Review team members.
(5) Criteria and Review Approaches. DOE line management
requires that the DOE Operational Readiness Review team
determines (and ensures that the contractor's Operational
Readiness Review team determines) the criteria and reviews
approaches to be used for their review based on the approved
breadth given in their plan-of-action and documents the
criteria and review approaches in their Operational
Readiness Review Implementation Plan.
(6) Approve and Use Implementation Plans. DOE line management
requires that the DOE Operational Readiness Review team
leader approves (and ensures that the contractor s
Operational Readiness Review team leader approves) their
respective Implementation Plans and use the Implementation
Plans to conduct their Operational Readiness Reviews. DOE
line management requires that the DOE Implementation Plan
(and ensures that the contractor s Implementation Plan) is
provided to EH for review and comment.
(7) Certification and Verification.
(a) The prerequisites for starting the DOE Operational
Readiness Review are the following.
1 DOE line management has received correspondence
from the responsible contractor certifying that
the facility is ready for startup or restart and
this has been verified by the contractor
Operational Readiness Review.
2 DOE line management has verified that the
contractor s preparations for startup or restart
have been completed.
3 DOE line management has certified that it meets
the DOE Plan-of-Action that includes, as a
minimum, the applicable DOE-specific core
requirements given in paragraph 4d, below.
(b) At the start of the DOE Operational Readiness Review,
all actions required for startup or restart shall be
complete with the exception of a manageable list of
open prestart findings that have a well-defined
schedule for closure to allow review of the results of
the closure process by the DOE Operational Readiness
Review team. In the certification and verification
process, DOE Operations Office line management shall
DOE O 425.1 7
9-29-95
document their actions taken to verify Operations
Office and contractor readiness including review of
closure of contractor Operational Readiness Review
findings, assessments of completion of defined
prerequisites, and other assessments performed to
ascertain readiness. Specific events significant to
the startup and restart process that occur prior to
the formal commencement of the DOE Operational
Readiness Review (e.g., site emergency response
drills, integrated equipment testing, etc.) shall be
reviewed by the DOE Operational Readiness Review team
when they are conducted.
Section 5
(8) Final Report.
(a) Upon completion of the contractor or DOE Operational
Readiness Review, DOE line management shall ensure a
final report is prepared and approved by the
Operational Readiness Review team leader. The final
report shall document the results of the Operational
Readiness Review and make a conclusion as to whether
startup or restart of the nuclear facility can proceed
safely. There shall be a statement in each
Operational Readiness Review final report as to
whether all identified nonconformances or schedules
for gaining compliance with applicable DOE Orders,
Secretary of Energy Notices, and
Standards/Requirements Identification Documents within
the scope of the Operational Readiness Review have
been justified in writing, have been formally
approved, and in the opinion of the Operational
Readiness Review team, maintain adequate protection of
the public health and safety, worker safety, and the
environment. This conclusion shall be based on:
1 Review of the program to document conformance
with applicable DOE requirements, including a
process to address new requirements; and
2 Extensive use of references to DOE requirements
in the Operational Readiness Review
documentation.
(b) Additionally, there shall be a "Lessons Learned"
section of the final report that may relate to design,
construction, operation, and decommissioning of
similar facilities and future Operational Readiness
Review efforts.
8 DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
(9) Closure of Prestart Findings. The mechanism for closure of
Operational Readiness Review prestart findings shall include
the following:
(a) Development of plans-of-action approved by DOE to
correct the findings. Action plans shall provide
evaluation of any overall programmatic deficiencies or
root causes.
(b) Documentation of completion of response actions
responding to the findings in a closure package.
Closure packages shall include a brief description of
actual corrective actions taken and reasons for
concluding that closure has been achieved.
(c) DOE verification of closure of prestart findings. The
organization verifying the closure will be designated
by the startup or restart authority.
(10) Resolution of Prestart Findings. DOE line management shall
ensure the contractor has satisfactorily resolved all
prestart findings of the DOE Operational Readiness Review
prior to startup or restart of the facility.
(11) Submit Final Report. The final report shall be submitted to
the startup/restart authority to be used as a basis to grant
approval of the start or restart of the nuclear facility. A
copy of the final report shall be provided to EH for review
and comment.
c. Requirements Applicable to Startup or Restarts of Nuclear
Facilities Involving Readiness Assessments.
(1) Readiness Assessment Procedures. Operations Offices shall
establish procedures for their offices (and ensure the
contractor establishes procedures) that define when a
Readiness Assessment is required and provides requirements
for conducting readiness assessments, including procedures
by which contractors will gain Operations Office approval
for the startup or restart of nuclear facilities. The
procedures shall require submittal of a startup notification
report to obtain approval to use a Readiness Assessment and
preparation of a formal plan-of-action that includes, as a
minimum, the breadth of the assessment, team leader
designation, and prerequisites for the assessment and shall
be approved by the startup or restart authority. For
shutdowns directed by contractor management, these
procedures may indicate that, except for serious safety
reasons, the contractor management may be the startup or
restart authority.
Section 6
DOE O 425.1 9
9-29-95
(2) Graded Approach. The Operations Offices Readiness
Assessment procedures shall specify (and DOE line management
shall ensure the contractor's Readiness Assessment
procedures specify) a graded approach to the tenets of
Operational Readiness requirements specified in this Order.
The procedures should indicate that the Readiness Assessment
may be as short and simple as a restart check procedure, or
that it may approach the breadth and depth of an Operational
Readiness Review, depending on the causes and duration of
the shutdown and the modifications accomplished during the
shutdown.
(3) Approval. The startup or restart authority, as designated
by the Operations Office Manager (or designee) may approve
the startups or restarts after any prestart findings are
corrected.
d. Minimum Core Requirements. Each of the minimum core requirements
listed below shall be addressed when developing the breadth of an
Operational Readiness Review. Justification shall be provided in
the plan-of-action, prepared in accordance with paragraphs 4b(2)
and (3), above, if it is determined that a particular core
requirement will not be reviewed. The plan-of-action may
reference a timely, independent review that addressed the
requirements in a technically sound manner to justify not
performing further evaluation of a core requirement during an
Operational Readiness Review.
(1) There are adequate and correct procedures and safety limits
for operating the process systems and utility systems.
(2) Training and qualification programs for operations and
operations support personnel have been established,
documented, and implemented. (The training and qualification
program encompasses the range of duties and activities
required to be performed.)
(3) Level of knowledge of operations and operations support
personnel is adequate based on reviews of examinations and
examination results and selected interviews of operating and
operations support personnel.
(4) Facility safety documentation is in place that describes the
"safety envelope" of the facility. The safety documentation
should characterize the hazards/risks associated with the
facility and should identify mitigating measures (systems,
procedures, administrative controls, etc.) that protect
workers and the public from those hazards/risks. Safety
systems and systems essential to worker and public safety
are defined and a system to maintain control over the design
and modification of facilities and safety-related utility
systems is established.
10 DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
(5) A program is in place to confirm and periodically reconfirm
the condition and operability of safety systems, including
safety related process systems and safety related utility
systems. This includes examinations of records of tests and
calibration of safety system and other instruments that
monitor limiting conditions of operation or that satisfy
Technical Safety Requirements. All systems are currently
operable and in a satisfactory condition.
(6) A process has been established to identify, evaluate, and
resolve deficiencies and recommendations made by oversight
groups, official review teams, audit organizations, and the
operating contractor.
(7) A systematic review of the facility s conformance to
applicable DOE Orders has been performed, any
nonconformances have been identified, and schedules for
gaining compliance have been justified in writing and
formally approved.
Section 7
(8) Management programs are established, sufficient numbers of
qualified personnel are provided, and adequate facilities
and equipment are available to ensure operational support
services (e.g., training, maintenance, waste management,
environmental protection, industrial safety and hygiene,
radiological protection and health physics, emergency
preparedness, fire protection, quality assurance,
criticality safety, and engineering) are adequate for
operations.
(9) A routine and emergency operations drill program, including
program records, has been established and implemented.
(10) An adequate startup or restart test program has been
developed that includes adequate plans for graded operations
testing to simultaneously confirm operability of equipment,
the viability of procedures, and the training of operators.
(11) Functions, assignments, responsibilities, and reporting
relationships are clearly defined, understood, and
effectively implemented with line management responsibility
for control of safety.
(12) The implementation status for DOE 5480.19, CONDUCT OF
OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE FACILITIES, of 7-9-90, is
adequate for operations.
(13) There are sufficient numbers of qualified personnel to
support safe operations.
DOE O 425.1 11
9-29-95
(14) A program is established to promote a site-wide culture in
which personnel exhibit an awareness of public and worker
safety, health, and environmental protection requirements
and, through their actions, demonstrate a high-priority
commitment to comply with these requirements.
(15) The facility systems and procedures, as affected by facility
modifications, are consistent with the description of the
facility, procedures, and accident analysis included in the
safety basis.
(16) The technical and managerial qualifications of those
personnel at the DOE Field organization and at DOE
Headquarters who have been assigned responsibilities for
providing direction and guidance to the contractor,
including the Facility Representatives, are adequate (DOE
Operational Readiness Review only).
(17) The breadth, depth, and results of the responsible
contractor Operational Readiness Review are adequate to
verify the readiness of hardware, personnel, and management
programs for operations (DOE Operational Readiness Review
only).
(18) Modifications to the facility have been reviewed for
potential impacts on procedures and training and
qualification. Procedures have been revised to reflect
these modifications and training has been performed to these
revised procedures.
(19) The technical and management qualifications of contractor
personnel responsible for facility operations are adequate.
(20) DOE Operations Office Oversight Programs, such as Occurrence
Reporting, Facility Representative, Corrective Action, and
Quality Assurance Programs, are adequate (DOE Operational
Readiness Review only).
e. Exemptions. Requirements for exemptions are provided in DOE O
251.1, DIRECTIVES SYSTEM.
f. Records Disposition. Requirements for maintaining documents, such
as those pertaining to Operational Readiness Reviews or Readiness
Assessments, are provided in DOE 1324.5B, RECORDS MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES.
a. DOE Line Management.
(1) Establish procedures (and ensure contractors establish
procedures) as necessary to manage startup and restart
actions in accordance with the requirements of this Order.
(2) Exercise the delegation authority and document all
delegations of authority made under the provisions granted
by this Order.
Section 8
(3) Determine whether adequate protection can most effectively
be achieved by continuing to operate under the terms of
existing contracts requiring compliance with old Orders or
by modifying the contract to incorporate the requirements of
revised Orders.
12 DOE O 425.1
9-29-95
(4) Determine that implementation of new rule or Order
requirements will provide adequate protection prior to
requesting contract modification to drop old Order
requirements from contract.
b. Heads of DOE Elements shall ensure that initiators of procurement
requests shall identify in procurement requests if the
requirements in the Contractor Requirements Document (Attachment
1) are to be applied to the award or subawards resulting from the
procurement request.
c. Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health (EH-1). In
addition to the general Departmental responsibilities specified in
the Functions, Assignments, and Responsibilities Manual (FAR),
exercise independent oversight of the startup and restart process
for nuclear facilities. This responsibility specifically entails
the following:
(1) In coordination with the cognizant Secretarial Officer
(CSO), perform independent reviews of startup and restart
activities as appropriate and provide results of these
reviews to DOE Operational Readiness Review team leaders,
cognizant Operations Office Managers, and cognizant
Secretarial Officers for resolution.
(2) Assess the Secretarial Officer, Operations Office, and
contractor procedures for startup or restart of nuclear
facilities and provide periodic reports to the Secretary on
their effectiveness.
(3) Review and comment on contractor and DOE plans-of-action and
Operational Readiness Review Implementation Plans for
startup or restart of nuclear facilities, including the
specification of the EH-proposed involvement in the startup
or restart activities.
(4) Review and comment on the Operational Readiness Review final
report recommendations regarding startup or restart to the
DOE startup or restart approving official.
DOE O 425.1 13 (and 14)
9-27-95
(5) Provide any dissenting opinion on the readiness of a
facility to startup or restart to DOE line management or the
Secretary if a significant safety concern is not being
properly corrected.
(6) If requested by the Secretary, concur in the final decision
to startup or restart a nuclear facility.
6. CONTACT. Questions concerning this Order should be referred to the
Director, Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31), phone
301-903-3465.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
ARCHER L. DURHAM
Assistant Secretary for
Human Resources and Administration