DOE O 331.1C Chg 3, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program
Functional areas: Employee Recognition, Performance Management
To establish requirements and responsibilities for the performance management program for all supervisory and non-supervisory employees at grades GS-15 and below or equivalent, employees in EJ and EK pay bands IV and V in the Excepted Service, and all wage grade employees. Admin Chg 1, dated 2-16-11. Admin Chg 2, dated 2-26-2013. Admin Chg 3, dated 11-13-14 supersedes Admin Chg 2.
Version history and related documents
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
Related documents
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY:
www.directivers.doe.gov Office of Human Capital Management
U.S. Department of Energy ADMIN CHANGE
Washington, D.C.
Chg 3: 11-13-2014
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE TO DOE O 331.1C, EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT AND RECOGNITION PROGRAM
1. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. To include additional clarification of information for
Quality Increase (QI).
2. LOCATIONS OF CHANGES:
Page Paragraphs Change To
7 4.d.(5)(a)1 1 the employee has not received
a QI or within-grade increase
(WGI) or equivalent pay
adjustment;
Removed text.
7-8 4.d.(5)(a)4-8 Added text
4 the employee must be
below step 10 of their
grade level (for GS
employees)
5 the employee has received
a Significantly Exceeds
Expectations (SE)
summary rating;
6 the employee has
demonstrated sustained
performance of outstanding
quality;
7 the employee has not
received a QI within the
preceding 52 consecutive
calendar weeks; and
8 the employee occupies a
“permanent position.”
DOE O 331.1C Chg 3
http://www.directivers.doe.gov/
AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY:
www.directivers.doe.gov Office of Human Capital Management
U.S. Department of Energy ORDER
Washington, DC
Approved: 10-15-2010
Chg 1: 2-16-11
Chg 2: 2-26-13
Chg 3: 11-13-14
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND RECOGNITION
PROGRAM
1. PURPOSE. To establish requirements and responsibilities for the performance
management program for all supervisory and non-supervisory employees at grades GS-15
and below or equivalent, employees in EJ and EK pay bands IV and V in the Excepted
Service, and all wage grade employees.
2. CANCELLATION. DOE O 331.1B, Employee Performance Management System, dated
3-14-01. (Note: DOE O 331.1B will remain in effect until this Order is implemented
October 1, 2010, and subsequent performance awards will be paid based on its
requirements.)
3. APPLICABILITY.
a. Departmental Applicability. Except for the exemptions in paragraph 3.c., this
directive applies to all Departmental elements.
The Administrator of National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) must
assure that NNSA employees comply with their respective responsibilities
under this directive. Nothing in this Order will be construed to interfere with
the NNSA Administrator’s authority under section 3212(d) of Public Law
(P.L.) 106-65 to establish Administration-specific policies, unless disapproved
by the Secretary.
In accordance with the responsibilities and authorities assigned by Executive
Order 12344, codified at 50 USC sections 2406 and 2511 and to ensure
consistency through the joint Navy/DOE Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, the
Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors (Director) will implement and oversee
requirements and practices pertaining to this directive for activities under the
Director’s cognizance, as deemed appropriate.
b. DOE Contractors. This directive does not apply to DOE contractors.
c. Equivalencies and Exemptions to DOE O 331.1C. Requests for exemption to this
Order must be submitted in memorandum form to the Director, Office of Human
Capital Management, Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer. The
memorandum must include the basis for the exemption, identify the requirement
for which the exemption is sought, and request a timeframe, as applicable.
DOE O 331.1C
http://www.directivers.doe.gov/
2 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
Exemption. This directive does not apply to:
(1) employees in Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Professional
Section 2
or Technical (SL/ST) positions.
(2) the Bonneville Power Administration.
(3) the award limits for Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy
(ARPA-E) employees in pay plans ER and ET who are subject to the
additional pay limits established by P.L. 111-358.
4. REQUIREMENTS.
a. General.
(1) The normal annual appraisal period is the fiscal year: October 1 through
September 30 of the subsequent calendar year [for exceptions, see
paragraphs 4.c.(7)-(11)].
(2) The minimum appraisal period is 90 days from the effective date that
the employee is assigned, detailed, or temporarily promoted to a
position. The appraisal period for employees who are assigned to a
position on or after July 4 of each year will be included in the following
appraisal period. Employees who have been covered by a performance
plan for at least 90 days and are detailed or temporarily promoted on or
after July 4 will receive their rating of record based on their permanent
position, while their detail or temporary promotion assignment will be
included in the following appraisal period.
(3) At least one progress review must be completed during the appraisal
period.
(4) Departmental elements must provide an atmosphere in which open and
frank two-way communications can be achieved between employees
and their supervisors regarding all aspects of this program.
(5) Information and training on the requirements and administration of the
program will be made available to all covered employees by the Office
of the Chief Human Capital Officer at (http://humancapital.doe.gov).
(6) Training is required for all covered employees and their supervisors at
least every 2 years; new employees are required to complete training
within the first 30 days of the effective date of their assignment.
(7) An employee must contact his/her servicing Human Resources Office
for procedures to request reconsideration of his/her rating of record.
http://humancapital.doe.gov/
DOE O 331.1C 3
10-16-2010
b. Performance Plans.
(1) Each covered employee must have a performance plan established.
Performance plans must be completed and signed by the employee and the
Rating and Reviewing Officials at the beginning of the appraisal period,
normally within 30 calendar days, but no later than 45 calendar days from
the effective date of an assignment, detail, or temporary promotion. For
assignments that begin on or after June 3, plans must be completed within
30 calendar days.
(2) A performance plan is to be developed jointly by the Rating Official and
employee or group of similarly situated employees, but the Rating
Official, in conjunction with the Reviewing Official, determines the
content if there is any disagreement with the employee.
(3) A plan must only contain critical elements that are specific, measurable,
achievable, relevant to the work performed, linked to organizational
mission and goals, and time-bound; contributing factors; and may include
dates, or milestones for specific deliverables or projects.
(4) Each critical element will include at least one contributing factor (see
Appendix A) that is important to successfully meeting performance
expectations.
(5) The number of critical elements must be at least 3, but no more than 6, in
which a critical element can be double- or triple-weighted for a maximum
of 6 weighted elements.
(6) Each critical element must be written only at the Meets Expectation (ME)
level, which is also referred to as the Fully Successful level.
Section 3
(7) Specific occupational and safety standards which must be included in
critical elements will only be in performance plans that require the
performance of occupational and safety as intrinsic to the duties of the
position.
(8) Only positions officially classified as supervisor (coded 2 or 4) must have
a critical element for supervision which will be at least double-weighted.
The supervisory critical element at Appendix B must be used as the
supervisory element for all supervisors.
c. Appraisal (Rating) Process.
(1) Each critical element must be rated at one of the following levels (see the
Definitions section for the description of each level):
(a) Exceeds Expectations (EE),
4 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
(b) Meets Expectations (ME),
(c) Needs Improvement (NI), or
(d) Fails to Meet Expectations (FME).
(2) A summary rating will be determined based on the chart at Appendix C.
The chart includes a fifth level, Significantly Exceeds Expectations (SE),
which is used when all critical elements are rated at EE. The chart
corresponds to pattern H in Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
section 430.208(d).
(3) The completed and signed appraisal form, which constitutes the rating of
record once signed by at least the Rating and Reviewing Officials, must be
submitted to the servicing human resources staff within 45 calendar days
from the end of the appraisal period.
(4) When an employee is detailed or temporarily promoted for 90 days or
more, the temporary supervisor must complete an advisory rating and
forward it to the supervisor of record for consideration in the rating of
record for the appraisal period.
(5) When the effective date for a reassignment or promotion within DOE is on
or before July 3, the losing organization is not required to complete an
advisory rating for the gaining organization to consider in determining the
rating of record for the appraisal period.
(6) When the effective date for a reassignment or promotion within DOE is
July 4 or later, the losing organization must complete a performance rating
that will serve as the rating of record for the appraisal period if the
employee was covered by a performance plan for at least 90 days in the
losing organization.
(7) When the effective date for a transfer into DOE is July 4 or later, the
rating of record for the appraisal period will be the losing agency’s final
rating for the employee if that agency provides one; otherwise, the
employee will not have a rating of record for that appraisal period.
(8) When the effective date for a transfer out of DOE is July 4 or later, the
losing organization must complete a performance rating that will serve as
the rating of record for the employee for the appraisal period if the
employee was covered by a performance plan for at least 90 days in the
losing organization.
(9) When an employee separates other than for a transfer before the end of an
appraisal period after being covered for at least 90 days, a performance
rating is not required to be completed.
DOE O 331.1C 5
10-16-2010
(10) When a Rating Official changes on or after July 4, the departing Rating
Official must complete performance ratings that will serve as the ratings
of record for the appraisal period for all subordinates who have been
covered by performance plans for at least 90 days.
(11) A new rating of record must be prepared for the following situations:
(a) when an employee’s summary rating has changed from ME or
Section 4
above to below ME or the reverse to document a decision to deny
or approve a within-grade increase;
(b) when an employee’s summary rating has changed from ME or
above to below ME or the reverse when administering a reduction
in force;
(c) when an intern covered by the Federal Career Intern Program or a
Presidential Management Fellow’s summary rating has changed
from ME or above to below ME or the reverse and is ready to be
converted to a permanent appointment;
(d) when an employee’s summary rating has improved above or
declined below their current summary rating of NI at the
completion of a Performance Assistance Plan (PAP); or
(e) when an employee’s summary rating has improved above their
current summary rating of FME at the completion of a
Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
d. Performance Awards.
(1) General.
(a) Management determines what type of award(s) will be offered
each employee based on eligibility, will take into consideration the
employee’s preference, and determines the award that will be
approved.
(b) An employee will only receive one type of award for a ME or
higher rating of record.
(c) When the effective date for a reassignment or promotion within
DOE is July 4 or later, the losing organization will determine the
appropriate award. If the award will be a cash award, then the
losing organization must provide the award amount based on the
employee’s salary at the time of the action and provide the funding
citation to the gaining organization to process the award.
6 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
(d) When an employee transfers into DOE on or after July 4, the
gaining organization will provide a pro-rated performance award
based on the losing agency’s rating of record if available for the
period of time in DOE as an incentive to transfer. This information
is to be included in the employee’s offer letter along with a
statement that, if the losing agency’s rating of record is not made
available or current since October 1 of the prior year, the employee
is not eligible for a performance award until the end of the
following appraisal period.
(2) Eligibility.
(a) A covered employee who is employed by the Department on
September 30 must have a summary rating of ME or above for the
current appraisal period.
(b) New hires, including transferees, and part-time employees who
have been covered by a performance plan for at least 90 days are
eligible for a pro-rated performance award from the date of
appointment to September 30.
(3) Pay Pools.
(a) Departmental elements will provide 3 to 4 percent of their covered
employees’ total salaries as of the last day of the annual appraisal
period (September 30). However, in the event that fiscal year
funding is not sufficient as a result of budget reductions, changes
in allocations or similar unanticipated circumstances, affected
heads of DOE elements may request an exception from the DOE
Chief Human Capital Officer. This exception would be limited to
the performance award requirements of this policy, especially if
granting performance awards would necessitate the need for a
reduction in force, furlough or other similar cost-cutting remedy.
(b) Separate pools will be established for supervisors and
non-supervisors based on the total salaries for each pool. The
percentage that is used for each pool will be the same.
(4) Cash Awards.
(a) Awards will be determined based on the summary rating and
shares multiplied by the applicable share value of the applicable
Section 5
pool and employee’s salary as follows:
1 SE – 5 shares,
2 EE – 4 shares,
DOE O 331.1C 7
10-16-2010
3 ME –
a 3 shares when the majority of weighted elements
are rated at ME and at least 1 at EE or the elements
are equally divided between EE and ME;
b 2 shares when all weighted elements are rated at
ME; or
c 1 share when the majority of weighted elements are
rated at ME or higher and less than 50% at NI, and
management elects to offer this award.
No shares will be awarded for a summary rating of NI or
FME.
(b) Pro-ration is determined by dividing the total hours in a pay status,
except for employees on military duty and those receiving
workers’ compensation who are to be treated as if they are in a pay
status for those periods, by 2080 hours and multiplying the result
times the pro-rated share value.
(5) Other Performance Awards.
(a) Quality Increase (QI). An employee with a summary rating of SE
is eligible for a quality step increase or equivalent pay adjustment,
which are both referred to as a quality increase, in lieu of a cash or
time-off award, if the following criteria are met for the entire
annual appraisal period:
1 the employee is at the full performance level of a career
ladder;
2 the employee has not been promoted, including a transfer
that results in a promotion;
3 the employee has been in the same grade or pay band level;
4 the employee must be below step 10 of their grade level
(for GS employees);
5 the employee has received a Significantly Exceeds
Expectations (SE) summary rating;
6 the employee has demonstrated sustained performance of
outstanding quality;
8 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
7 the employee has not received a QI within the preceding 52
consecutive calendar weeks; and
8 the employee occupies a “permanent position.”
(b) Time-Off Award. An employee may be given a time-off award in
lieu of a QI or cash award based on the summary rating as follows:
1 SE – 50 hours;
2 EE – 40 hours;
3 ME –
a 30 hours when the majority of weighted elements
are rated at ME and at least 1 at EE or the elements
are equally divided between EE and ME;
b 20 hours when all weighted elements are rated at
ME; and
c 10 hours when the majority of weighted elements
are rated at ME or higher; and less than 50% at NI,
and management elects to offer this award.
No time off will be awarded for a summary rating of NI or
FME.
(c) Pro-ration is determined by dividing the total hours in a pay status,
except for employees on military duty and those receiving
workers’ compensation who are to be treated as if they are in a pay
status for those periods, by 2080 hours and multiplying the result
times the applicable hours for the rating and rounding to the
nearest whole hour.
e. Poor or Unacceptable Performance.
(1) If at any time during the appraisal period, an employee demonstrates that
he or she is performing at least one critical element at the NI level, then
the supervisor must inform the employee and provide assistance to attain
an acceptable level of performance by developing an informal
Performance Assistance Plan (PAP).
(2) When an employee demonstrates that he or she is performing at least one
critical element at the FME (unacceptable) level, then the supervisor must
inform the employee and provide assistance to attain an acceptable level of
performance by developing a formal Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
At the conclusion of the period in which the employee is subject to the PIP,
Section 6
DOE O 331.1C 9
10-16-2010
management must take appropriate action based on the results of that
assistance. If the employee’s performance lapses back to the FME level on
the same critical element(s) within 1 year from the start of the PIP, the
rating official may propose a performance based action without a PIP.
f. Reductions in Force. When preparing for reduction in force, credit will be
provided for additional years of service in accordance with 5 CFR 351.504 for
performance as follows:
(1) 20 years for SE,
(2) 16 years for EE, and
(3) 12 years for ME.
When multiple summary rating patterns are involved in a competitive area, a
separate determination will be made at that time which will provide the most
equitable treatment for affected employees.
g. Other Awards and Forms of Recognition.
(1) If a Departmental element wants to establish a local awards program, the
program must:
(a) recognize and reward individuals and/or teams, including those
who support a Departmental element but are not in that element,
based on
1 suggestions and inventions;
2 training, education, and development; and
3 other noteworthy achievements or contributions;
(b) recognize achievements or contributions of employees who are on
detail, on an Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assignment,
or have transferred to an international organization;
(c) establish criteria for determining the value of an achievement,
contribution, or suggestion;
(d) publicize the criteria for awards periodically;
(e) relate award choice and size to the magnitude of the achievement,
contribution, or suggestion; and
(f) ensure that special awards that are based on an employee’s position
clearly exceed the recognition afforded as a performance award.
10 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
(2) All awards that affect more than one Departmental element must be
coordinated with the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer. That
office will maintain a list of Secretarial and Departmental awards and post
them on its web site (http://humancapital.doe.gov).
(3) Documentation must include a description and value of the achievement or
contribution, how the criteria have been met, and the approving official’s
signature and date.
(4) Time-off awards, including those for performance, are limited to 80 hours
over a 12-month period. Awarding managers and award recipients must
arrange to have the time off taken within 1 year of when granted or the
award will be forfeited. Heads of Departmental elements may approve
extensions of up to 90 days on a case-by-case basis for unavoidable
reasons that have prevented or will prevent using the time.
(5) Limit the value of nonmonetary items conferred in connection with
informal recognition awards to a “nominal value” of $50 or less.
h. Implementation. This directive must be implemented October 1, 2010.
5. RESPONSIBILTIES.
a. Secretary.
(1) Approves Secretarial Awards.
(2) Recommends to the Office of Personnel Management an award for an
employee in excess of $10,000.
b. Administrator, NNSA.
(1) Coordinates the NNSA performance program with the Office of the Chief
Human Capital Officer.
(2) Establishes an NNSA awards program.
(3) Approves performance awards up to $10,000.
(4) Approves Special Act or Service awards up to $10,000.
(5) Approves on-the-spot awards up to $500.
(6) Recommends an award in excess of $10,000 to the Secretary.
c. Heads of Departmental Elements Other than NNSA.
http://humancapital.doe.gov/
Section 7
DOE O 331.1C 11
10-16-2010
(1) Establish local and, with the concurrence of the Office of the Chief
Human Capital Officer, Departmental awards programs.
(2) Approve performance awards up to $10,000.
(3) Approve Special Act or Service awards up to $7,500.
(4) Recommend awards in excess of $7,500 to the Office of the Chief Human
Capital Officer.
(5) Approve on-the-spot awards up to $500.
(6) Approve extensions of up to 90 days to the time limit for using time-off
awards [see paragraph 4g(4)].
(7) Ensure that adequate funds are available for payment of monetary awards.
(8) Publicize and coordinate Departmental awards and ceremonies, and
approve travel expenses for guests.
(9) Request exceptions to program requirements.
d. Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer.
(1) Develops the Departmental Employee Performance Management System
and obtains OPM approval of the system; develops the performance and
recognition program for covered employees; and ensures appropriate
information and training on the requirements and administration of the
program is available to covered employees.
(2) Approves exemptions to program requirements; coordinates on the NNSA
performance management program.
(3) Approves Special Act or Service awards for Departmental elements except
the NNSA up to $10,000.
(4) Coordinates all Secretarial awards and concurs on all Departmental
awards prior to implementation.
(5) Maintains a list of Secretarial and Departmental awards and posts them on
its web site.
(6) Publicizes and coordinates Secretarial awards ceremonies and approves
travel expenses for guests.
(7) Reviews Departmental element awards programs for compliance and
accountability purposes.
12 DOE O 331.1C
10-16-2010
(8) Coordinates beneficial suggestions that apply to more than one
Departmental element or that affect another agency.
(9) Coordinates and provides applicable reports to OPM.
e. Supervisors.
(1) Develop performance plans jointly with employees.
(2) Conduct and document progress reviews.
(3) Prepare appraisals as Rating and Reviewing Officials.
(4) Provide assistance to employees to improve performance to an acceptable
level.
(5) Develop informal Performance Assistance Plans (PAPs) when an
employee’s performance level drops to the NI level on at least one critical
element.
(6) Develop formal Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) when an
employee’s performance level drops to the FME level on at least one
critical element, and take appropriate action based on the results of the
assistance.
6. DEFINITIONS.
a. Days. This means calendar days.
b. Exceeds Expectations (EE). Performance at this level is dramatically higher than
that described at the ME level in terms of work products and/or results achieved,
high cost-savings or cost avoidances, and/or extremely high levels of efficiency,
effectiveness, and timeliness.
c. Fails to Meet Expectations (FME). This is the lowest level at which a critical
element can be evaluated. It indicates that the employee’s performance is
“Unacceptable”. When one critical element is rated FME, the overall summary
level rating is FME.
d. Meets Expectations (ME). This is the “Fully Successful” level that is described
for each critical element and is intended to describe the level that is reasonably
expected to be achieved in terms of quality, quantity, effectiveness, and
timeliness.
DOE O 331.1C 13 (and 14)
10-16-2010
e. Needs Improvement (NI). A critical element rated at this level indicates that an
Section 8
employee has not met the expectations for that critical element and that
performance at this level is clearly lower than what was reasonably expected at
ME, but is not considered unacceptable. Supervisory intervention and assistance,
counseling, formal training, and/or developmental assignments are needed to
improve performance to raise it to the ME level.
f. Share. The portion of a pay pool used to determine an employee’s cash award.
The value is 1-5. The value is based on how the summary rating is
determined.
g. Significantly Exceeds Expectations (SE). The highest level attainable as a
summary rating level and is regarded as the "Outstanding" level. To attain this
level, all critical elements must be rated at the EE level.
7. REFERENCES.
a. 5 U.S.C., Chapters 43 (Performance Appraisal) and 45 (Incentive Awards).
b. 5 CFR, Parts 293 (Personnel Records, Subpart D, Employee Performance File
System Records); 430 (Performance Management); and 451 (Awards).
c. Department of Energy Performance Management System approved by OPM
April 5, 1999.
8. CONTACT. Questions concerning this directive should be addressed to the Office of
Strategic Planning & Policy at (202) 586-8451.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
DANIEL B. PONEMAN
Deputy Secretary
DOE O 331.1C Appendix A
10-16-2010 A-1
APPENDIX A
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
NOTE: Supervisors are not limited to the following examples for each factor, nor is an employee
required to do everything described for a factor. Specific Departmental element
requirements or clarifications may be added.
Customer Service:
Responds to customer communications in a timely manner
Identifies customers’ needs and concerns
Designs or adapts products and services to meet customer needs
Works cooperatively with customers and colleagues to resolve disagreements in
expectations and deliverables
Keeps customers informed on progress of deliverables
Meets agreed upon schedules and commitments or provides reason(s) for not doing so
Adjusts to changing needs and is flexible to customers’ requirements, providing that there
are no limitations beyond the employee’s control and customers’ requests are not
unreasonable
Customer surveys and/or feedback reflect that the employee responds appropriately and
in a timely manner so that customers are at least reasonably satisfied
NOTE: Inherent in this factor is effective communications and resourcefulness with
customers
Communication:
Keeps supervisors and colleagues informed of issues, problems, and work status in a
timely manner
Responds to noncustomer communications in a timely manner
Describes issues in a clear, concise, and/or convincing manner, both verbally and in
writing
Communicates in a technically accurate and supported manner
Exercises judgment in sharing information
Coordinates communications that affect other offices with those offices
Appendix A DOE O 331.1C
A-2 10-16-2010
Develops organized, persuasive presentations
Listens to others’ ideas and viewpoints and seeks to clarify for understanding
Displays a positive attitude that fosters non-confrontational communications
Uses communication tools and resources, e.g., email, voicemail, power point, graphics,
etc., effectively
NOTE: Inherent in this factor is the need to be resourceful in using communication tools and
resources
Teamwork:
Actively contributes to the accomplishment of organizational goals
Section 9
Builds collegial, effective relationships that facilitate achieving desired goals
Supports others in the accomplishment of their assignments
Shares knowledge, expertise, information, and/or credit with co-workers
Contributes in staff/team meetings as appropriate
Supports organizational decisions once they are made
Treats colleagues with courtesy, respect, and fairness
Uses collaborative decision-making techniques to facilitate teamwork
NOTE: Inherent in this factor is the employee’s responsibility to work cooperatively with
others
Responsibility/Accountability:
Accepts responsibility for completing work assignments, work performed, and any
problem(s) associated with it within the employee’s control
Completes developmental and training requirements in a timely manner
Meets milestones and due dates for assignments
Actively participates in the development of his/her assignments, performance and
development plans, and career goals
Keeps supervisors, colleagues, and customers informed of availability
DOE O 331.1C Appendix A
10-16-2010 A-3 (and A-4)
Maintains current awareness and adheres to relevant government and organization
regulations, policies, and procedures
Practices safe work habits and takes action to resolve unsafe conditions
Resourcefulness/Innovation:
Initiates and/or supports quality improvements in systems, programs, products, services,
and/or work processes
Recommends alternatives to established thinking, policies, practices, methods, and
approaches designed to achieve organizational efficiency, cost savings/avoidance, etc.
Readily adapts or develops regulations, policies, and procedures to new situations
Utilizes contacts to network and identify solutions to issues
Safety:
Complies with corrective actions identified to resolve unsafe conditions in an individual’s
work area
Complies with the DOE Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health (FEOSH)
Program, safety and health requirements, and the local occupant emergency plan
Adheres to established emergency response procedures during exercises, drills, and
emergency conditions
Takes required training and developmental opportunities to assure that the employee is
knowledgeable of their safety responsibilities, workplace hazards and controls,
emergency response procedures, and the DOE FEOSH Program.
DOE O 331.1C Appendix B
10-16-2010 B-1 (and B-2)
APPENDIX B
SUPERVISORY CRITICAL ELEMENT
Carries out supervisory/managerial duties in accordance with Federal regulations and DOE
directives, within established deadlines, to provide subordinates with leadership and direction in
order to support (insert organization) and DOE in meeting its mission, goals and objectives.
Seeks out feedback from others; considers employee and customer feedback to develop and
implement initiatives to improve program/project performance, promotes diversity and
cooperation among peers and subordinates, while guiding, motivating and stimulating positive
responses. Manages the performance appraisal program for his/her subordinates through meeting
deadlines, aligning subordinate performance plans to DOE goals, providing meaningful and
timely feedback, making distinctions in ratings and awards, and addressing poor performance
and other employee relations issues.
(Identify any organizational milestone, deliverables, or deadlines)
DOE O 331.1C Appendix C
10-16-2010 C-1 (and C-2)
APPENDIX C
SUMMARY RATING DETERMINATION CHART
Total Weighted Critical Elements And Summary Rating
All at EE SE
Majority at EE No element at NI EE
Equally divided between EE and ME No element at NI ME
All or a majority at ME No element at NI ME
Majority at EE or ME Less than 50% at NI ME
At least 50% at NI No element at FME NI
At least one at FME FME