DOE O 1360.8A, Analysis of Benefits and Costs for Information Technology Resources Initiatives
Functional areas: Management Systems and Standards
Cancels DOE O 1360.8. Canceled by DOE N 251.1.
Superseded By:
DOE N 251.1, Cancellation of Directives on Sep 25, 1995
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE N 251.1Cancellation of Directives (Sep 25, 1995)
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
THIS PAGE MUST BE KEPT WITH DOE 1360.8A. ANALYSES OF BENEFITS
AND COSTS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INITIATIVES.
E 1360.8A. ANALYSES OF BENEFITS AND COSTS FOR INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INITIATIVES. HAS REVISED DOE 1360.8 TO
REFLECT ORGANIZATIONAL TITLE AND ROUTING SYMBOL EDITORIAL
REVISIONS REWIRED BY SEN-6. NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES HAVE
BEEN MADE. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF PAGES AFFECTED BY THE
REVISIONS. THE ORDER HAS BEEN ISSUED AS A REVISION.
U.S. Department of Energy ORDER
Washington, D.C.
DOE 1360.8A
5 - 1 8 - 9 2
SUBJECT:
ANALYSES OF BENEFITS AND COSTS FOR INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INITIATIVES
1. PURPOSE. TO establish policies, responsibilities and procedures
2.
3.
4.
regarding the:
a. Use of analyses of benefits and costs (ABC) as a tool to assist in
the decision-making process for evaluating alternatives for the
acquisition or development of information technology resources
initiatives; and
b. Selection of the most cost-effective alternative which meets the
goals, missions, and/or objectives of the Department.
CANCELLATION. DOE 1360.8, ANALYSES OF BENEFITS AND COSTS FOR
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INITIATIVES, of 1-12-90.
SCOPE. The provisions Of this Order apply tO all Departmental Elements,
Heads of Field Elements (the senior ranking DOE official at a DOE office
location), and management and operating contractors as provided by law
and/or contract as implemented through the appropriate contracting
officer.
EXCLUSIONS. At the discretion of each site manager, certain information
technology resources initiatives may be exempt from the site’s ABC Pro-
gram. The rationale for such exemptions will be included in the -
policies and procedures that describe each site’s ABC program. Examples
of information technology resources initiatives exempted from coverage
are:
a. Information technology resources initiatives that are integrally
embedded within the instrumentation associated with an experiment
or other application. An example of this is information
technology resources initiatives embedded within a weapons system.
b. Information technology resources initiatives that are not
integrally embedded but are acquired as part of a larger noninfor-
mation technology resources initiative turnkey system provided
under one contract and in which the selection or supplier chosen
is not at the discretion of the Department or its management and
operating contractors. Examples of this are information technol-
ogy resources initiatives acquired as part of a fire alarm system,
other physical security systems, or environmental monitoring
systems.
DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY:
All Departmental Elements Office of Information
Resources Management
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
2
5.
c. Information technology resources initiatives which are acquired
and used as an integral part of the power transmission systems of
the power marketing administrations, including the power system
control computers and operational telecommunications systems.
d. Automated energy information systems under the auspices of the
Energy Information Administration.
REFERENCES.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-n, ‘Preparation
and Submission of Budget Estimates,” as amended annually by a trans-
mittal memorandum, which provides instructions and guidance to federal
agencies on the preparation and submission of annual budgets and
associated material. The last several versions of this Circular have
contained guidance on the submission of ABC’s in support of major
information technology initiatives contained in agency budget
requests.
Section 2
OMB Circular No. A-94, “Discount Rates to be Used in Evaluating
Time-Distributed Costs and Benefits,” which prescribes a standard
discount rate to be used in evaluating the measurable costs and/or
benefits of programs or projects when they are distributed over time.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (formerly National
Bureau of Standards) Federal Information Processing Standards
Publication No. 64, “Guidelines for Documentation of Computer Programs
and Automated Data Systems for the Initiation Phase, “Section 4.3,
which provides examples of the formats for presenting ABC results.
Department of Energy ABC Guidelines: “A Manager’s Guide to Analysis
of Benefits and Costs,” of 6-88, and “An Analyst's Handbook for
Analysis of Benefits and Costs,” of 6-88. The former describes the
usefulness of the ABC’s in the information technology resources
management decision-making process, and the latter provides infor-
mation on how to conduct such analyses and display the results for
management decision-making.
DOE 1330.lC, COMPUTER SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT, of 1-12-90, which
establishes policy and responsibilities for computer software
management.
DOE 1360.lA, ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT Of COMPUTING RESOURCES, of
5-30-86, which establishes Departmental policies and procedures for
the acquisition and management of computing resources.
DOE 1360.2A, UNCLASSIFIED COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM, of 5-20-88, which
establishes requirements, policies, responsibilities, and procedures
for developing, implementing, and sustaining a DOE unclassified
computer security program.
DOE 1360.8A 3
5-18-92
h. DOE 5300.lB, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, of 12-2-88, which establishes
policies, responsibilities, and guidance for the planning, acquis-
ition, coordination, management, review, engineering, and use of
telecommunications services.
6. DEFINITIONS.
a. Analysis of Benefits and Costs is a term used to describe an economic
analysis technique used to help managers make resource decisions by
comparing the relative worth of proposed projects or investments when
there is more than one way to satisfy an objective. The ABC process
assists in determining the various alternatives for accomplishing an
information technology resources initiative and choosing the most
cost-effective alternative which meets the organization’s missions or
goals. ABC’s are also commonly referred to as Benefit-Cost,
Cost/Benefit, Economic, or Investment Analysis.
b. Information System is a set of management procedures, operations,
computer software and hardware, and functions devoted to the gener-
ation, assembly, utilization, storage, retrieval, and dissemination of
data and information in order to facilitate the flow of information
from its source to its user(s) and to provide information for
management decision-making.
c. Information Technology Resources Initiative is either an information
technology resources acquisition (i.e., a computing resource or
telecommunications item); or the acquisition, development, or modi-
fication of an automated IS. An information technology resources
initiative may also be any combination of the above.
7. POLICY.
a.
b.
c.
ABC’s shall be used as tools, as appropriate, to aid management and
operating contractors or DOE Headquarters and field elements in making
decisions regarding the acquisition or development of information
technology resources initiatives. Organizations shall consider the
reasonable alternatives for the acquisition or development of infor-
mation technology resources initiatives and select the most cost-
effective alternative consistent with the organization’s goals or
missions and the objectives or requirements of a particular
information technology resources initiative.
Section 3
ABC’s shall be applied, as appropriate, in the risk assessment process
to determine the most cost-effective application of protection
measures in the implementation of the unclassified computer security
program.
Each DOE and DOE management and operating contractor site shall
establish an effective ABC program consistent with good management
practices, integrated into existing information technology resources
4
d.
e.
f.
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
initiative decision-making processes, and tailored to their specific
site requirements.
ABC’s should be conducted at a level of detail commensurate with the
size of the project and other considerations, including the cost of
the project and the importance of the proposed initiative to the
accomplishment of the Departmental missions, objectives, and goals.
Departmental ABC guideline documents (page 2, paragraph 5d) are
recommended for use by organizations in establishing an ABC program
and/or preparing ABC’s. As a minimum, all sites should consider
utilizing the standard formats in these guidelines for displaying the
results of their analyses.
The ABC programs and implmenting directives at each site shall be
subject to review during formal periodic evaluations of sites by the
cognizant oversight organization.
8. RESPONSIBIL ITIES AND AUTHORITIES.
a. Director of Administration and Human Resource Management (AD-1)
through the Director of Information Resources Management (AD-20)
shall establish policies, procedures, and guidelines to assure that a
viable Departmental ABC program is developed and maintained.
b. Director of Information Resources Management through the:
(1) Director of Information Resources Management Policy, Plans and
Oversight (AD-24) shall:
(a) Conduct management reviews of the effectiveness of the field
elements, the Headquarters Energy Information Computer
Center, and the Headquarters Administrative Computing Center
in implementing the requirements of this Order.
(b) Provide managerial and technical advice and assistance for
conducting ABC’s, as requested.
(c) With assistance of the cognizant Program organization(s),
determine information technology resources items under
the cognizance of AD-24 (i.e., computing resources and/or
automated IS) requiring submission of an ABC to OMB.
(d) Serve as the overall Departmental focal point on ABC matters
for computing resources and automated IS.
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
(2) Director of Information Technology Services and Operations
(AD-25) shall:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
5
Conduct telecommunications appraisals of the effectiveness
of the field elements in implementing the requirements of
this Order.
Provide managerial and technical advice and assistance for
conducting ABC’s for telecommunications initiatives as
requested.
With assistance of the cognizant Program organization(s),
determine information technology resources items under
the cognizance of AD-25 (i.e., telecommunications items)
requiring submission of an ABC to OMB.
Serve as the overall Departmental focal point on ABC matters
for telecommunications initiatives. -
c. Heads of Field Elements and the Director of Information Resources
Management as appropriate, (the Office of Information Resources
Management Policy, Plans and Oversight and/or the Office of
Information Technology Services and Operations have the following
responsibilities for sites not reporting through a field element to
Headquarters) shall:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Section 4
Provide guidance and assistance to the sites over which they
have cognizance on implementing and maintaining a viable ABC
program for information technology resources initiatives.
Implement and coordinate an appropriate management oversight
process which ensures awareness and compliance with this Order
at cognizant DOE and DOE management and operating contractor
sites.
Provide managerial and technical advice and assistance, as
requested or deemed appropriate.
Review the summary results of site ABC’s for information
technology resources initiatives as part of the review process
of the site planning, budgeting, acquisition, and/or development
activities.
Review and comment on ABC’s from their sites which are requested
for OMB review.
Ensure that, through the contracting officer, the provisions of
this Order are appropriately implemented in all management and
operating contracts.
6
9. PROCEDURES.
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
a. The ABC program at each site shall include policies, responsibilities,
and procedures for:
(1) Integrating ABC’s into existing site management decisionmaking
processes for information technology resources initiatives.
(2) Determining which information technology resources initiatives
are to be covered by the ABC program and the level of detail
appropriate for the ABC’s. At a minimum, however, ABC’s shall be
conducted for information technology resources initiatives for
which the cost of system development and/or acquisition will
exceed either $25 million over the life cycle or $10 million in
any one fiscal year.
(3) Defining the procedures to be followed in conducting ABC’s. The
use of the DOE ABC Guidelines (page 2, paragraph 5d) or a similar
procedure is encouraged.
(4) Stating when ABC’s should be conducted by the site. The five
distinct decision points in the life cycle of an information
technology resources initiative where ABC’s or a modified version
of them may be appropriate are discussed in Section 1.2 of “A
Manager’s Guide to Analysis of Benefits and Costs” and also
discussed in some detail in Section 1.2 of “An Analyst’s Handbook
for Analysis of Benefits and Costs.” These five distinct
decision points in the life cycle of an information technology
resources initiative, where it may be appropriate to conduct an
ABC, are listed below:
(a) Project Initiation. Using the ABC process in the initial
decision to proceed with an analysis of a project. This is
commonly called the go/no-go decision point.
(b) Project Development. The selection among alternative
methods for meeting a project’s requirements. The ABC
process should assist in identifying the most cost-effective
alternative.
(c) Budget Formulation. Using the ABC process to assist in the
selection of a financing option for the proposed alterna-
tive. This selection is then used to determine the type and
amount of funds to request in the budget. As an example,
before new budget year information technology resources
initiatives are included in Departmental budget requests,
they should be supported by an ABC.
(d) Project Acquisition. The choice among competing vendor
proposals: If it is decided to acquire or contract for an
information technology resources capability, a modified ABC
DOE 1360.8A
5-18-92
7 (and 8)
(e)
process can help do a cost comparison of the proposals.
This type of ABC consists of evaluating the technical
aspects of proposals, as well as their life-cycle costs,
against predetermined criteria. This analysis assists in
selecting the proposal most advantageous to the Department.
Section 5
Project Review. Post-implementation monitoring. This ABC
process concentrates on the review of information to deter-
mine whether or not the project accomplished its intended
results. A comparison of actual benefits and costs to those
projected in prior ABC’s helps managers evaluate to what
extent the initiative has met its goals. ABC’s used for
post-implementation reviews can help identify patterns that
may require changes in the assumptions of future-site ABC’s.
This information, when shared throughout the organization,
can improve future ABC’s and related decisions.
(5) Stating what organization(s) will be responsible for
conducting/preparing ABC’s at the site.
(6) Defining the site’s internal review and approval process for
ABC ‘ S .
b. As requested (e.g., the annual Call for Information Technology
Resources Long-Range Site Plans, DOE Orders, etc.), sites shall
include the results of ABC’s for information technology resources
initiatives in their justifications relative to planning, budgeting,
acquisition, and/or development activities.
c. As requested, sites shall provide ABC’s for information technology
resources initiatives, required to be submitted to OMB, to cognizant
Headquarters Program Offices and through appropriate channels to the
Director of Information Resources Management for review prior to
transmittal to OMB. Instructions for the submittal of these ABC’s
will be included in the appropriate Departmental budget calls issued
by the Director of Administration and Human Resources Management.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:
DONALD W. PEARMAN, JR.